REVIEW 2 cited by
Task Arithmetic for Language Expansion in Speech Translation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) has gained interest in speech-text multimodal foundation models, achieving strong performance on instruction-tuned speech translation (ST). However, expanding language pairs is costly due to re-training on combined new and previous datasets. To address this, we aim to build a one-to-many ST system from existing one-to-one ST systems using task arithmetic without re-training. Direct application of task arithmetic in ST leads to language confusion; therefore, we introduce an augmented task arithmetic method incorporating a language control model to ensure correct target language generation. Our experiments on MuST-C and CoVoST-2 show BLEU score improvements of up to 4.66 and 4.92, with COMET gains of 8.87 and 11.83. In addition, we demonstrate our framework can extend to language pairs lacking paired ST training data or pre-trained ST models by synthesizing ST models based on existing machine translation (MT) and ST models via task analogies.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Scaling and Prompting for Improved End-to-End Spoken Grammatical Error Correction
Pseudo-labelling and prompting with fluent transcriptions improve end-to-end spoken grammatical error correction and feedback for Whisper-based models, but the benefits depend on model size.
-
A correlation-permutation approach for speech-music encoders model merging
A layer-wise correlation-permutation alignment lets a merged HuBERT-MERT encoder keep speech performance and improve music scores, beating linear interpolation by 19.5 points on the authors' aggregate score.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.