Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

DocMamba: Efficient Document Pre-training with State Space Model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.11887 v2 pith:PIDPZGHN submitted 2024-09-18 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords docmambadocumentcomplexitycomputationalmodelresultsspacestate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In recent years, visually-rich document understanding has attracted increasing attention. Transformer-based pre-trained models have become the mainstream approach, yielding significant performance gains in this field. However, the self-attention mechanism's quadratic computational complexity hinders their efficiency and ability to process long documents. In this paper, we present DocMamba, a novel framework based on the state space model. It is designed to reduce computational complexity to linear while preserving global modeling capabilities. To further enhance its effectiveness in document processing, we introduce the Segment-First Bidirectional Scan (SFBS) to capture contiguous semantic information. Experimental results demonstrate that DocMamba achieves new state-of-the-art results on downstream datasets such as FUNSD, CORD, and SORIE, while significantly improving speed and reducing memory usage. Notably, experiments on the HRDoc confirm DocMamba's potential for length extrapolation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Survey on Question Answering over Visually Rich Documents: Methods, Challenges, and Trends

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A structured overview of question answering over visually rich documents, comparing encoding, vision-only, and multi-page methods, and highlighting comparability issues in existing benchmarks.

Pith tools