Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Additive-feature-attribution methods: a review on explainable artificial intelligence for fluid dynamics and heat transfer

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.11992 v1 pith:L2GLHAYV submitted 2024-09-18 physics.flu-dyn cs.AI

classification physics.flu-dyncs.AI
keywords methodsadditive-feature-attributionshapfluidmodelsdynamicsfeaturesfluid-mechanics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The use of data-driven methods in fluid mechanics has surged dramatically in recent years due to their capacity to adapt to the complex and multi-scale nature of turbulent flows, as well as to detect patterns in large-scale simulations or experimental tests. In order to interpret the relationships generated in the models during the training process, numerical attributions need to be assigned to the input features. One important example are the additive-feature-attribution methods. These explainability methods link the input features with the model prediction, providing an interpretation based on a linear formulation of the models. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP values) are formulated as the only possible interpretation that offers a unique solution for understanding the model. In this manuscript, the additive-feature-attribution methods are presented, showing four common implementations in the literature: kernel SHAP, tree SHAP, gradient SHAP, and deep SHAP. Then, the main applications of the additive-feature-attribution methods are introduced, dividing them into three main groups: turbulence modeling, fluid-mechanics fundamentals, and applied problems in fluid dynamics and heat transfer. This review shows thatexplainability techniques, and in particular additive-feature-attribution methods, are crucial for implementing interpretable and physics-compliant deep-learning models in the fluid-mechanics field.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Local Additive Feature Attribution: A Mathematical Taxonomy and Reporting Checklist

    cs.LG 2026-07 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    Local additive feature-attribution methods are only interpretable relative to stated choices about value functions, baselines, paths, perturbation distributions, and conservation rules.

  2. Foundation Models for Clean Energy Forecasting: A Comprehensive Review

    eess.SY 2025-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey of foundation model methods, data, and open problems for renewable energy forecasting, built from roughly 218 cited works.

Pith tools