Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

"I Don't Use AI for Everything": Exploring Utility, Attitude, and Responsibility of AI-empowered Tools in Software Development

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.13343 v2 pith:HJBX5BNG submitted 2024-09-20 cs.SE cs.CR

classification cs.SEcs.CR
keywords softwaredevelopmenttoolsadoptionai-empowereddeveloperssecurityacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

AI-empowered tools have emerged as a transformative force, fundamentally reshaping the software development industry and promising far-reaching impacts across diverse sectors. This study investigates the adoption, impact, and security considerations of AI-empowered tools in the software development process. Through semi-structured interviews with 19 software practitioners from diverse backgrounds, we explore three key aspects: the utility of AI tools, developers' attitudes towards them, and security and privacy responsibilities. Our findings reveal widespread adoption of AI tools across various stages of software development. Developers generally express positive attitudes towards AI, viewing it as an efficiency-enhancing assistant rather than a job replacement threat. However, they also recognized limitations in AI's ability to handle complex, unfamiliar, or highly specialized tasks in software development. Regarding security and privacy, we found varying levels of risk awareness among developers, with larger companies implementing more comprehensive risk management strategies. Our study provides insights into the current state of AI adoption in software development and offers recommendations for practitioners, organizations, AI providers, and regulatory bodies to effectively navigate the integration of AI in the software industry.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SoK: From Generation to Consumption of Privacy Documents in Software Systems

    cs.CR 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A systematic review of 290 papers (2010 to 2025) organizes privacy-document research into a five-stage lifecycle and identifies 15 trends, 21 opportunities, and 4 research directions.

Pith tools