Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Temporally Aligned Audio for Video with Autoregression

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.13689 v1 pith:2HQFOKEX submitted 2024-09-20 cs.CV cs.MMcs.SDeess.AS

Temporally Aligned Audio for Video with Autoregression

classification cs.CV cs.MMcs.SDeess.AS
keywords v-auraalignmentrelevancesamplestemporalvisualvisualsoundaligned
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We introduce V-AURA, the first autoregressive model to achieve high temporal alignment and relevance in video-to-audio generation. V-AURA uses a high-framerate visual feature extractor and a cross-modal audio-visual feature fusion strategy to capture fine-grained visual motion events and ensure precise temporal alignment. Additionally, we propose VisualSound, a benchmark dataset with high audio-visual relevance. VisualSound is based on VGGSound, a video dataset consisting of in-the-wild samples extracted from YouTube. During the curation, we remove samples where auditory events are not aligned with the visual ones. V-AURA outperforms current state-of-the-art models in temporal alignment and semantic relevance while maintaining comparable audio quality. Code, samples, VisualSound and models are available at https://v-aura.notion.site

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Efficient Video-to-Audio Generation via Multiple Foundation Models Mapper

    cs.CV 2025-09 reject novelty 5.0

    A GPT-2 mapper over dual visual encoders claims 16% training cost and better alignment, but test-time use of true class labels makes the comparison invalid for V2A.