REVIEW 2 cited by
60 Data Points are Sufficient to Fine-Tune LLMs for Question-Answering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) encode extensive world knowledge through pre-training on massive datasets, which can then be fine-tuned for the question-answering (QA) task. However, effective strategies for fine-tuning LLMs for the QA task remain largely unexplored. To address this gap, we categorize supervised fine-tuning (SFT) data based on the extent of knowledge memorized by the pretrained LLMs and conduct a series of empirical analyses. Our experiments, involving four LLMs from three different model families, focus on three key factors: the amount of data required for SFT, the impact of different SFT datasets on model performance, and how data requirements vary across LLMs. The results show that as few as 60 data points during the SFT stage can activate the knowledge encoded during pre-training, enabling LLMs to perform the QA task. Additionally, SFT with data of varying memory levels has a significant impact on LLM performance, with the optimal dataset differing based on the specific model being fine-tuned. Future research will delve deeper into the mechanisms underlying these phenomena.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Resolving Knowledge Conflicts in Domain-specific Data Selection: A Case Study on Medical Instruction-tuning
KDS selects instruction-tuning data by measuring knowledge alignment (NLI entailment vs reference) and knowledge consistency (cluster entropy of sampled responses), and reports gains on medical QA benchmarks.
-
KaFT: Knowledge-aware Fine-tuning for Boosting LLMs' Domain-specific Question-Answering Performance
KaFT down-weights training examples that conflict with a model's own knowledge, improving medical QA accuracy over vanilla SFT across four open LLMs.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.