Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Is speckle noise more challenging to mitigate than additive noise?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.16585 v2 pith:2N6E4ESY submitted 2024-09-25 math.ST cs.ITeess.SPmath.ITstat.TH

classification math.STcs.ITeess.SPmath.ITstat.TH
keywords noiseadditivebetaratespecklefunctionsigmaestimating
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We study the problem of estimating a function in the presence of both speckle and additive noises, commonly referred to as the de-speckling problem. Although additive noise has been thoroughly explored in nonparametric estimation, speckle noise, prevalent in applications such as synthetic aperture radar, ultrasound imaging, and digital holography, has not received as much attention. Consequently, there is a lack of theoretical investigations into the fundamental limits of mitigating the speckle noise.This paper is the first step in filling this gap. Our focus is on investigating the minimax estimation error for estimating a $\beta$-H\"older continuous function and determining the rate of the minimax risk. Specifically, if $n$ represents the number of data points, $f$ denotes the underlying function to be estimated, $\hat{\nu}_n$ is an estimate of $f$, and $\sigma_n$ is the standard deviation of the additive Gaussian noise, then $\inf_{\hat{\nu}_n} \sup_f \mathbb{E}_f\| \hat{\nu}_n - f \|^2_2$ decays at the rate $(\max(1,\sigma_n^4)/n)^{\frac{2\beta}{2\beta+1}}$. Note that the rate achieved under purely additive noise is $({\sigma_n^2/n})^{\frac{2\beta}{2\beta+1}}$. We will provide a detailed comparison of this rate with the one obtained in the presence of both noise types across different regimes of their relative magnitudes, and discuss the insights that emerge from these comparisons.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multilook Coherent Imaging: Theoretical Guarantees and Algorithms

    stat.ML 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Under a deep image prior, the mean squared error of maximum likelihood reconstruction in undersampled multilook coherent imaging is bounded by C1 times n k log n/(m^2 L) plus sqrt(k log n)/m, and a bagged projected gr...

Pith tools