REVIEW 4 cited by
Can LLMs Really Learn to Translate a Low-Resource Language from One Grammar Book?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Extremely low-resource (XLR) languages lack substantial corpora for training NLP models, motivating the use of all available resources such as dictionaries and grammar books. Machine Translation from One Book (Tanzer et al., 2024) suggests that prompting long-context LLMs with one grammar book enables English-Kalamang translation, an XLR language unseen by LLMs - a noteworthy case of linguistics helping an NLP task. We investigate the source of this translation ability, finding almost all improvements stem from the book's parallel examples rather than its grammatical explanations. We find similar results for Nepali and Guarani, seen low-resource languages, and we achieve performance comparable to an LLM with a grammar book by simply fine-tuning an encoder-decoder translation model. We then investigate where grammar books help by testing two linguistic tasks, grammaticality judgment and gloss prediction, and we explore what kind of grammatical knowledge helps by introducing a typological feature prompt that achieves leading results on these more relevant tasks. We thus emphasise the importance of task-appropriate data for XLR languages: parallel examples for translation, and grammatical data for linguistic tasks. As we find no evidence that long-context LLMs can make effective use of grammatical explanations for XLR translation, we conclude data collection for multilingual XLR tasks such as translation is best focused on parallel data over linguistic description.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Read it in Two Steps: Translating Extremely Low-Resource Languages with Code-Augmented Grammar Books
Representing grammar rules as code functions and retrieving them rule-by-rule improves LLM translation of extremely low-resource languages, yielding up to a 13.1% chrF++ gain over full grammar book prompting.
-
Compensating for Data with Reasoning: Low-Resource Machine Translation with LLMs
Fragment-Shot Prompting, which retrieves example translations for sentence fragments, substantially improves LLM translation into and between Ladin variants but not into Italian.
-
A POS Tier Is the Key to Automated Annotation for Low-Resource Language Documentation: Neural Interlinear Glossing for Irabu, a Southern Ryukyuan Language
For Irabu Ryukyuan, a POS tier improves neural grammatical glossing by +4.4 points with oracle POS and can more than halve data needs, but current tagger errors cancel the gain in a fully automatic pipeline.
-
Explain-then-Process: Using Grammar Prompting to Enhance Grammatical Acceptability Judgments
Feeding an LLM-generated grammar explanation back to a model before a grammaticality judgment improves minimal-pair accuracy, with the largest gains for smaller models.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.