REVIEW 4 cited by
DeSTA2: Developing Instruction-Following Speech Language Model Without Speech Instruction-Tuning Data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
DeSTA2: Developing Instruction-Following Speech Language Model Without Speech Instruction-Tuning Data
read the original abstract
Recent end-to-end speech language models (SLMs) have expanded upon the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by incorporating pre-trained speech models. However, these SLMs often undergo extensive speech instruction-tuning to bridge the gap between speech and text modalities. This requires significant annotation efforts and risks catastrophic forgetting of the original language capabilities. In this work, we present a simple yet effective automatic process for creating speech-text pair data that carefully injects speech paralinguistic understanding abilities into SLMs while preserving the inherent language capabilities of the text-based LLM. Our model demonstrates general capabilities for speech-related tasks without the need for speech instruction-tuning data, achieving impressive performance on Dynamic-SUPERB and AIR-Bench-Chat benchmarks. Furthermore, our model exhibits the ability to follow complex instructions derived from LLMs, such as specific output formatting and chain-of-thought reasoning. Our approach not only enhances the versatility and effectiveness of SLMs but also reduces reliance on extensive annotated datasets, paving the way for more efficient and capable speech understanding systems.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Hearing to Translate: The Effectiveness of Speech Modality Integration into LLMs
Cascaded systems remain the most reliable for speech translation overall, but recent SpeechLLMs match or outperform them in many conditions while standalone speech models lag.
-
Can Large Audio Language Models Ignore Multilingual Distractors? An Evaluation of Their Selective Auditory Attention Capabilities
Introduces the MUSA benchmark and evaluates LALMs showing that strong single-speaker performance fails to ensure robust selective attention under multilingual interference, with errors from source confusion and unreso...
-
ORCA: Open-ended Response Correctness Assessment for Audio Question Answering
ORCA predicts the distribution of human correctness ratings for open-ended audio QA answers and matches or beats LLM judges while also estimating annotator disagreement.
-
On The Landscape of Spoken Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey
A literature survey that organizes spoken language models by architecture, training, and evaluation choices and identifies key challenges and future directions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.