REVIEW 2 cited by
Stochastic Inverse Problem: stability, regularization and Wasserstein gradient flow
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Inverse problems in physical or biological sciences often involve recovering an unknown parameter that is random. The sought-after quantity is a probability distribution of the unknown parameter, that produces data that aligns with measurements. Consequently, these problems are naturally framed as stochastic inverse problems. In this paper, we explore three aspects of this problem: direct inversion, variational formulation with regularization, and optimization via gradient flows, drawing parallels with deterministic inverse problems. A key difference from the deterministic case is the space in which we operate. Here, we work within probability space rather than Euclidean or Sobolev spaces, making tools from measure transport theory necessary for the study. Our findings reveal that the choice of metric -- both in the design of the loss function and in the optimization process -- significantly impacts the stability and properties of the optimizer.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Distributional Inverse Homogenization
Statistics of microstructure are identifiable from bulk-property distributions via generative-model calibration under periodic and stochastic homogenization.
-
Random Inverse Problems with Structural and Probabilistic Ambiguities
Marginalizing independent per-observation random forward-model parameters leaves only structural ambiguity in the posterior, while a shared parameter or observed output density preserves or blurs the probabilistic modes.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.