Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

RATIONALYST: Mining Implicit Rationales for Process Supervision of Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.01044 v2 pith:NGEB7FQL submitted 2024-10-01 cs.AI cs.CL

classification cs.AIcs.CL
keywords reasoningrationalystpre-trainingrationalesdatafine-tunedimplicitlogical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The reasoning steps generated by LLMs might be incomplete, as they mimic logical leaps common in everyday communication found in their pre-training data: underlying rationales are frequently left implicit (unstated). To address this challenge, we introduce RATIONALYST, a model for process-supervision of reasoning based on pre-training on a vast collection of rationale annotations extracted from unlabeled data. We extract 79k rationales from web-scale unlabelled dataset (the Pile) and a combination of reasoning datasets with minimal human intervention. This web-scale pre-training for reasoning allows RATIONALYST to consistently generalize across diverse reasoning tasks, including mathematical, commonsense, scientific, and logical reasoning. Fine-tuned from LLaMa-3-8B, RATIONALYST improves the accuracy of reasoning by an average of 3.9% on 7 representative reasoning benchmarks. It also demonstrates superior performance compared to significantly larger verifiers like GPT-4 and similarly sized models fine-tuned on matching training sets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Improving RL Exploration for LLM Reasoning through Retrospective Replay

    cs.LG 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RRL replays value-model-selected promising intermediate states during LLM RL training, preserving exploration and improving performance on code, math, and RLHF tasks.

  2. Generative AI Act II: Test Time Scaling Drives Cognition Engineering

    cs.CL 2025-04 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Test-time scaling techniques such as long chain-of-thought, tree search, and self-correction define the paper's 'cognition engineering' paradigm, which it surveys, taxonomizes, and tutorials.

Pith tools