Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Automated Knowledge Concept Annotation and Question Representation Learning for Knowledge Tracing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.01727 v2 pith:YMOH2MMA submitted 2024-10-02 cs.LG cs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.CL
keywords learningknowledgequestionsannotationapproachautomatedembeddingsexisting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Knowledge tracing (KT) is a popular approach for modeling students' learning progress over time, which can enable more personalized and adaptive learning. However, existing KT approaches face two major limitations: (1) they rely heavily on expert-defined knowledge concepts (KCs) in questions, which is time-consuming and prone to errors; and (2) KT methods tend to overlook the semantics of both questions and the given KCs. In this work, we address these challenges and present KCQRL, a framework for automated knowledge concept annotation and question representation learning that can improve the effectiveness of any existing KT model. First, we propose an automated KC annotation process using large language models (LLMs), which generates question solutions and then annotates KCs in each solution step of the questions. Second, we introduce a contrastive learning approach to generate semantically rich embeddings for questions and solution steps, aligning them with their associated KCs via a tailored false negative elimination approach. These embeddings can be readily integrated into existing KT models, replacing their randomly initialized embeddings. We demonstrate the effectiveness of KCQRL across 15 KT algorithms on two large real-world Math learning datasets, where we achieve consistent performance improvements.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. EduClaw-Bench: A Long-Horizon Benchmark for Pedagogical LLM Agents with Simulated Learners

    cs.CY 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 30-day, knowledge-tracing-grounded simulated learner benchmark for tutoring agents finds that no base model or harness alone determines quality and that almost all tested combinations plateau within days.

  2. Personalized Exercise Recommendation with Semantically-Grounded Knowledge Tracing

    cs.AI 2025-07 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A framework that uses LLM-annotated knowledge concepts and a knowledge tracing simulator to train RL policies for exercise recommendation, with a model-based value estimator that improves simulated knowledge gains.

  3. A Hierarchical Probabilistic Framework for Incremental Knowledge Tracing in Classroom Settings

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A hidden Markov tree over knowledge concepts with EM and one-step incremental updates outperforms deep and LLM knowledge tracing baselines in low-resource online classroom simulations.

Pith tools