REVIEW 3 cited by
Leopard: A Vision Language Model For Text-Rich Multi-Image Tasks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Text-rich images, where text serves as the central visual element guiding the overall understanding, are prevalent in real-world applications, such as presentation slides, scanned documents, and webpage snapshots. Tasks involving multiple text-rich images are especially challenging, as they require not only understanding the content of individual images but reasoning about inter-relationships and logical flows across multiple visual inputs. Despite the importance of these scenarios, current multimodal large language models (MLLMs) struggle to handle such tasks due to two key challenges: (1) the scarcity of high-quality instruction tuning datasets for text-rich multi-image scenarios, and (2) the difficulty in balancing image resolution with visual feature sequence length. To address these challenges, we propose Leopard, an MLLM tailored for handling vision-language tasks involving multiple text-rich images. First, we curated about one million high-quality multimodal instruction-tuning data, tailored to text-rich, multi-image scenarios. Second, we proposed an adaptive high-resolution multi-image encoding module to dynamically optimize the allocation of visual sequence length based on the original aspect ratios and resolutions of images. Experiments on a diverse set of benchmarks reveal that our model consistently outperforms state-of-the-art systems, such as Llama-3.2 and Qwen2-VL, in challenging text-rich, multi-image evaluations. Remarkably, our approach achieves outstanding performance using only 1.2M training instances, all of which are fully open-sourced, demonstrating both high efficiency and effectiveness compared to models trained on large-scale in-house data. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/tencent-ailab/Leopard.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
WeEdit: A Dataset, Benchmark and Glyph-Guided Framework for Text-centric Image Editing
WeEdit trains a glyph-guided, RL-optimized image editor on a 330K-pair synthetic multilingual dataset and reports open-source SOTA on its own bilingual and multilingual text-editing benchmarks.
-
DocOCR-Eval: A Correction-Based Framework for OCR Tool Selection Without Ground Truth
OCR tools can be ranked without ground-truth labels by measuring how much a multimodal LLM must correct each tool's output.
-
Return of the Encoder: Maximizing Parameter Efficiency for SLMs
At equal small sizes, encoder-decoder language models are faster on edge hardware and, after distillation from a larger decoder-only teacher, match or beat decoder-only models on several benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.