REVIEW 1 cited by
Achieving Fairness in Predictive Process Analytics via Adversarial Learning (Extended Version)
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Predictive business process analytics has become important for organizations, offering real-time operational support for their processes. However, these algorithms often perform unfair predictions because they are based on biased variables (e.g., gender or nationality), namely variables embodying discrimination. This paper addresses the challenge of integrating a debiasing phase into predictive business process analytics to ensure that predictions are not influenced by biased variables. Our framework leverages on adversial debiasing is evaluated on four case studies, showing a significant reduction in the contribution of biased variables to the predicted value. The proposed technique is also compared with the state of the art in fairness in process mining, illustrating that our framework allows for a more enhanced level of fairness, while retaining a better prediction quality.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
FairLoop: Software Support for Human-Centric Fairness in Predictive Business Process Monitoring
FairLoop distills predictive neural models into editable decision trees, lets users cut out unfair rules, and fine-tunes the model on corrected labels for business process monitoring.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.