Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Towards a Benchmark for Large Language Models for Business Process Management Tasks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.03255 v2 pith:3M3PFEGW submitted 2024-10-04 cs.AI cs.CL

classification cs.AIcs.CL
keywords llmsmodelsperformancetasksbenchmarksassessbusinesslanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

An increasing number of organizations are deploying Large Language Models (LLMs) for a wide range of tasks. Despite their general utility, LLMs are prone to errors, ranging from inaccuracies to hallucinations. To objectively assess the capabilities of existing LLMs, performance benchmarks are conducted. However, these benchmarks often do not translate to more specific real-world tasks. This paper addresses the gap in benchmarking LLM performance in the Business Process Management (BPM) domain. Currently, no BPM-specific benchmarks exist, creating uncertainty about the suitability of different LLMs for BPM tasks. This paper systematically compares LLM performance on four BPM tasks focusing on small open-source models. The analysis aims to identify task-specific performance variations, compare the effectiveness of open-source versus commercial models, and assess the impact of model size on BPM task performance. This paper provides insights into the practical applications of LLMs in BPM, guiding organizations in selecting appropriate models for their specific needs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Assessing the Business Process Modeling Competences of Large Language Models

    cs.SE 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Open-source LLMs can produce BPMN process models that rival human experts on syntax and readability, but they lag on semantic accuracy and frequently generate invalid BPMN-XML.

  2. On the Potential of Large Language Models to Solve Semantics-Aware Process Mining Tasks

    cs.DB 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fine-tuned Llama-3 and Mistral reach macro F1 0.69 to 0.88 and fitness 0.80 to 0.84 on five new semantics-aware process mining benchmarks, while few-shot in-context learning stays near random.

Pith tools