Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Sm: enhanced localization in Multiple Instance Learning for medical imaging classification

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · Submitted 4 Oct 2024

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim A thorough empirical validation shows that our module leads to state-of-the-art performance in localization while being competitive or superior in classification.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2410.03276 (version 3)
Pith IDFFVPW6J3, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAggelos K. Katsaggelos, Francisco M. Castro-Mac\'ias, Pablo Morales-\'Alvarez, Rafael Molina, Yunan Wu. "Sm: enhanced localization in Multiple Instance Learning for medical imaging classification." arXiv:2410.03276 (2024). https://pith.science/paper/FFVPW6J3
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,299 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.07 · states limitation 0.10 · human participants 0.32 · controlled comparison 0.33 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.90 · mentions code or data availability 0.98.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) is widely used in medical imaging classification to reduce the labeling effort. While only bag labels are available for training, one typically seeks predictions at both bag and instance levels (classification and localization tasks, respectively). Early MIL methods treated the instances in a bag independently. Recent methods account for global and local dependencies among instances. Although they have yielded excellent results in classification, their performance in terms of localization is comparatively limited. We argue that these models have been designed to target the classification task, while implications at the instance level have not been deeply investigated. Motivated by a simple observation -- that neighboring instances are likely to have the same label -- we propose a novel, principled, and flexible mechanism to model local dependencies. It can be used alone or combined with any mechanism to model global dependencies (e.g., transformers). A thorough empirical validation shows that our module leads to state-of-the-art performance in localization while being competitive or superior in classification. Our code is at https://github.com/Franblueee/SmMIL.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) is widely used in medical imaging classification to reduce the labeling effort. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 While only bag labels are available for training, one typically seeks predictions at both bag and instance levels (classification and localization tasks, respectively). background 1.00 0.06 0.02 asserted 0.74
s2 Early MIL methods treated the instances in a bag independently. background 1.00 0.03 0.01 asserted 1.00
s3 Recent methods account for global and local dependencies among instances. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s4 Although they have yielded excellent results in classification, their performance in terms of localization is comparatively limited. gap 0.84 0.08 0.07 asserted 0.99
s5 We argue that these models have been designed to target the classification task, while implications at the instance level have not been deeply investigated. gap 0.99 0.13 0.06 asserted 0.89
s6 Motivated by a simple observation -- that neighboring instances are likely to have the same label -- we propose a novel, principled, and flexible mechanism to model local dependencies. contribution 0.86 0.67 0.10 asserted 0.91
s7 It can be used alone or combined with any mechanism to model global dependencies (e.g., transformers). method 0.79 0.40 0.05 asserted 0.87
s8 A thorough empirical validation shows that our module leads to state-of-the-art performance in localization while being competitive or superior in classification. result 1.00 0.96 0.83 asserted 1.00
s9 Our code is at https://github.com/Franblueee/SmMIL. contribution 0.77 0.35 0.02 asserted 0.83

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.94.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) is widely used in medical imaging classification to reduce the labeling effort. While only bag labels are available for training, one typically seeks predictions at both bag and instance levels (classification and localization tasks, respectively). Early MIL methods treated the instances in a bag independently. Recent methods account for global and local dependencies among instances. Although they have yielded excellent results in classification, their performance in terms of localization is comparatively limited. We argue that these models have been designed to target the classification task, while implications at the instance level have not been deeply investigated. Motivated by a simple observation -- that neighboring instances are likely to have the same label -- we propose a novel, principled, and flexible mechanism to model local dependencies. It can be used alone or combined with any mechanism to model global dependencies (e.g., transformers). A thorough empirical validation shows that our module leads to state-of-the-art performance in localization while being competitive or superior in classification. Our code is at https://github.com/Franblueee/SmMIL.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 5 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
Cites as support 1 paper
Cites as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.