Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Taxonomy Tree Generation from Citation Graph

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.03761 v2 pith:DIHNGW2D submitted 2024-10-02 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords citationtaxonomyhierarchicalgenerationgraphtaxonomiesclusteringcoherent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Constructing taxonomies from citation graphs is essential for organizing scientific knowledge, facilitating literature reviews, and identifying emerging research trends. However, manual taxonomy construction is labor-intensive, time-consuming, and prone to human biases, often overlooking pivotal but less-cited papers. In this paper, to enable automatic hierarchical taxonomy generation from citation graphs, we propose HiGTL (Hierarchical Graph Taxonomy Learning), a novel end-to-end framework guided by human-provided instructions or preferred topics. Specifically, we propose a hierarchical citation graph clustering method that recursively groups related papers based on both textual content and citation structure, ensuring semantically meaningful and structurally coherent clusters. Additionally, we develop a novel taxonomy node verbalization strategy that iteratively generates central concepts for each cluster, leveraging a pre-trained large language model (LLM) to maintain semantic consistency across hierarchical levels. To further enhance performance, we design a joint optimization framework that fine-tunes both the clustering and concept generation modules, aligning structural accuracy with the quality of generated taxonomies. Extensive experiments demonstrate that HiGTL effectively produces coherent, high-quality taxonomies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Security and Privacy Taxonomy Generation from Mobile App Reviews

    cs.CL 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    TaxoScale scales taxonomy construction to 601,257 privacy/security app-review pseudo-labels, reporting higher path, level, coverage, and novelty scores than four baselines evaluated on a 100K subset.

  2. LLM4SR: A Survey on Large Language Models for Scientific Research

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A systematic review of LLM-based systems for hypothesis discovery, experiment planning, scientific writing, and peer review, including benchmarks, evaluation methods, and open challenges.

Pith tools