REVIEW 2 cited by
Taxonomy Tree Generation from Citation Graph
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Constructing taxonomies from citation graphs is essential for organizing scientific knowledge, facilitating literature reviews, and identifying emerging research trends. However, manual taxonomy construction is labor-intensive, time-consuming, and prone to human biases, often overlooking pivotal but less-cited papers. In this paper, to enable automatic hierarchical taxonomy generation from citation graphs, we propose HiGTL (Hierarchical Graph Taxonomy Learning), a novel end-to-end framework guided by human-provided instructions or preferred topics. Specifically, we propose a hierarchical citation graph clustering method that recursively groups related papers based on both textual content and citation structure, ensuring semantically meaningful and structurally coherent clusters. Additionally, we develop a novel taxonomy node verbalization strategy that iteratively generates central concepts for each cluster, leveraging a pre-trained large language model (LLM) to maintain semantic consistency across hierarchical levels. To further enhance performance, we design a joint optimization framework that fine-tunes both the clustering and concept generation modules, aligning structural accuracy with the quality of generated taxonomies. Extensive experiments demonstrate that HiGTL effectively produces coherent, high-quality taxonomies.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Security and Privacy Taxonomy Generation from Mobile App Reviews
TaxoScale scales taxonomy construction to 601,257 privacy/security app-review pseudo-labels, reporting higher path, level, coverage, and novelty scores than four baselines evaluated on a 100K subset.
-
LLM4SR: A Survey on Large Language Models for Scientific Research
A systematic review of LLM-based systems for hypothesis discovery, experiment planning, scientific writing, and peer review, including benchmarks, evaluation methods, and open challenges.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.