Pith. sign in

REVIEW

TA3: Testing Against Adversarial Attacks on Machine Learning Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.05334 v1 pith:5DRPAFXL submitted 2024-10-06 cs.CR cs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.LG
keywords attacksmodelstestingadversarialattackhitllearningmachine
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Adversarial attacks are major threats to the deployment of machine learning (ML) models in many applications. Testing ML models against such attacks is becoming an essential step for evaluating and improving ML models. In this paper, we report the design and development of an interactive system for aiding the workflow of Testing Against Adversarial Attacks (TA3). In particular, with TA3, human-in-the-loop (HITL) enables human-steered attack simulation and visualization-assisted attack impact evaluation. While the current version of TA3 focuses on testing decision tree models against adversarial attacks based on the One Pixel Attack Method, it demonstrates the importance of HITL in ML testing and the potential application of HITL to the ML testing workflows for other types of ML models and other types of adversarial attacks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools