REVIEW 2 cited by
Privacy Vulnerabilities in Marginals-based Synthetic Data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
When acting as a privacy-enhancing technology, synthetic data generation (SDG) aims to maintain a resemblance to the real data while excluding personally-identifiable information. Many SDG algorithms provide robust differential privacy (DP) guarantees to this end. However, we show that the strongest class of SDG algorithms--those that preserve \textit{marginal probabilities}, or similar statistics, from the underlying data--leak information about individuals that can be recovered more efficiently than previously understood. We demonstrate this by presenting a novel membership inference attack, MAMA-MIA, and evaluate it against three seminal DP SDG algorithms: MST, PrivBayes, and Private-GSD. MAMA-MIA leverages knowledge of which SDG algorithm was used, allowing it to learn information about the hidden data more accurately, and orders-of-magnitude faster, than other leading attacks. We use MAMA-MIA to lend insight into existing SDG vulnerabilities. Our approach went on to win the first SNAKE (SaNitization Algorithm under attacK ... $\varepsilon$) competition.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Ensembling Membership Inference Attacks Against Tabular Generative Models
No single membership inference attack dominates across tabular generative models, and unsupervised ensembles of attacks achieve better average rankings.
-
Risk In Context: Benchmarking Privacy Leakage of Foundation Models in Synthetic Tabular Data Generation
LLM-based tabular generators reproduce seed rows often enough that membership-inference attacks succeed more against them than against GAN, VAE, or diffusion baselines.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.