Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Treat Visual Tokens as Text? But Your MLLM Only Needs Fewer Efforts to See

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.06169 v3 pith:QZTJHRX3 submitted 2024-10-08 cs.CV

Treat Visual Tokens as Text? But Your MLLM Only Needs Fewer Efforts to See

classification cs.CV
keywords visualtokenscomputationalmllmsacrossarchitecturesattentioncomputation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

By treating visual tokens from visual encoders as text tokens, Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable progress across diverse visual understanding tasks, leveraging the robust architectures of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, as token counts grow, the quadratic scaling of computation in LLMs introduces a significant efficiency bottleneck, impeding further scalability. Although recent approaches have explored pruning visual tokens or employing lighter LLM architectures, the computational overhead from an increasing number of visual tokens remains a substantial challenge. In this study, we investigate the redundancy in visual computation at both the parameter and computational pattern levels within LLaVA, a representative MLLM, and introduce a suite of streamlined strategies to enhance efficiency. These include neighbor-aware visual token attention, pruning of inactive visual attention heads, and selective layer dropping for visual computations. By implementing these strategies in LLaVA, we achieve a reduction in computational demands of 88% while maintaining model performance across key benchmarks. Additionally, we validate the existence of visual computational redundancy in other MLLMs, such as Qwen2-VL-7B and InternVL-2.0-4B/8B/26B. These results present a novel pathway for MLLMs to handle dense visual tokens with minimal computational costs. Code and model checkpoints will be released to support further research.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Can VLMs Truly Forget? Benchmarking Training-Free Visual Concept Unlearning

    cs.CV 2026-04 conditional novelty 8.0

    VLM-UnBench demonstrates that prompt-based training-free unlearning in VLMs leaves forget accuracy near the no-instruction baseline except under oracle conditions that reveal the target concept.

  2. Counting to Four is still a Chore for VLMs

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    VLMs fail at counting because visual evidence degrades in later language layers, and a lightweight Modality Attention Share intervention can encourage better use of image information during answer generation.

  3. EvoComp: Learning Visual Token Compression for Multimodal Large Language Models via Semantic-Guided Evolutionary Labeling

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    EvoComp compresses visual tokens in MLLMs by 3x while retaining 99.3% accuracy via an evolutionary labeling strategy that searches for low-loss, semantically diverse token subsets.

  4. Growing a Multi-head Twig via Distillation and Reinforcement Learning to Accelerate Large Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    TwigVLM adds a twig module to VLMs for twig-guided token pruning and self-speculative decoding, retaining 96% performance after pruning 88.9% visual tokens and delivering 154% speedup on long responses for LLaVA-1.5-7B.