Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

CheXalign: Preference fine-tuning in chest X-ray interpretation models without human feedback

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.07025 v3 pith:IDUGQZMM submitted 2024-10-09 cs.CV cs.CL

classification cs.CVcs.CL
keywords feedbackadditionalfine-tuningpreferenceradiologyautomatedchallengechest
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Radiologists play a crucial role in translating medical images into actionable reports. However, the field faces staffing shortages and increasing workloads. While automated approaches using vision-language models (VLMs) show promise as assistants, they require exceptionally high accuracy. Most current VLMs in radiology rely solely on supervised fine-tuning. Meanwhile, additional preference fine-tuning in the post-training pipeline has become standard practice in the general domain. The challenge in radiology lies in the prohibitive cost of obtaining radiologist feedback at scale. To address this challenge, we propose an automated pipeline for preference feedback, focusing on chest X-ray radiology report generation (RRG). Specifically, our method leverages publicly available datasets containing pairs of images and radiologist-written reference reports with reference-based metrics, or Judges, eliminating the need for additional radiologist feedback. We investigate reward overoptimization via length exploitation in this setting and introduce a length-controlled version of the GREEN score. Our best-performing setup achieves state-of-the-art CheXbert scores on the MIMIC-CXR dataset for the RRG task while on average maintaining robust performance across six additional image perception and reasoning tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CheXPO: Preference Optimization for Chest X-ray VLMs with Counterfactual Rationale

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A preference optimization strategy using confidence-based hard example mining, similarity retrieval, and synthetic counterfactual rationales improves chest X-ray VQA accuracy by 8.93% relative over supervised fine-tuning.

Pith tools