REVIEW 1 cited by
Distilling Analysis from Generative Models for Investment Decisions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Professionals' decisions are the focus of every field. For example, politicians' decisions will influence the future of the country, and stock analysts' decisions will impact the market. Recognizing the influential role of professionals' perspectives, inclinations, and actions in shaping decision-making processes and future trends across multiple fields, we propose three tasks for modeling these decisions in the financial market. To facilitate this, we introduce a novel dataset, A3, designed to simulate professionals' decision-making processes. While we find current models present challenges in forecasting professionals' behaviors, particularly in making trading decisions, the proposed Chain-of-Decision approach demonstrates promising improvements. It integrates an opinion-generator-in-the-loop to provide subjective analysis based on each news item, further enhancing the proposed tasks' performance.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Evaluating Investment Logic in Large Language Models: A Real-World Benchmark Towards Personalzied Financial Agents
A 201,247-decision benchmark shows LLMs produce plausible investment logic (~4/5) but weak event grounding (0.8-2.8/5), gaps that outcome-only metrics hide.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.