REVIEW 2 cited by
Exploring the Role of Reasoning Structures for Constructing Proofs in Multi-Step Natural Language Reasoning with Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
When performing complex multi-step reasoning tasks, the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to derive structured intermediate proof steps is important for ensuring that the models truly perform the desired reasoning and for improving models' explainability. This paper is centred around a focused study: whether the current state-of-the-art generalist LLMs can leverage the structures in a few examples to better construct the proof structures with \textit{in-context learning}. Our study specifically focuses on structure-aware demonstration and structure-aware pruning. We demonstrate that they both help improve performance. A detailed analysis is provided to help understand the results.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Surfacing the Unsaid: CUE-Bench for Affective Stance in Chinese Discourse
CUE-Bench provides 51,823 Chinese discourse instances annotated with a nine-way Affective Stance defined by explicit-implicit polarity, plus pragmatic intent and fine-grained emotion labels.
-
Semiotic logical hexagon theory for LLM logical reasoning
Applying the classical logical hexagon to structure proposition meanings before deduction improves LLM logical reasoning accuracy by about 2.4 to 2.7 points on average across three model backbones.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.