Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Honest AI: Fine-Tuning "Small" Language Models to Say "I Don't Know", and Reducing Hallucination in RAG

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.09699 v1 pith:ACTBH7HE submitted 2024-10-13 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords approachesllmsfine-tuninginformationmodelshallucinationlanguagesmall
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Hallucination is a key roadblock for applications of Large Language Models (LLMs), particularly for enterprise applications that are sensitive to information accuracy. To address this issue, two general approaches have been explored: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to supply LLMs with updated information as context, and fine-tuning the LLMs with new information and desired output styles. In this paper, we propose Honest AI: a novel strategy to fine-tune "small" language models to say "I don't know" to reduce hallucination, along with several alternative RAG approaches. The solution ranked 1st in Task 2 for the false premise question. The alternative approaches include using RAG with search engine and knowledge graph results, fine-tuning base LLMs with new information and combinations of both approaches. Although all approaches improve the performance of the LLMs, RAG alone does not significantly improve the performance and fine-tuning is needed for better results. Finally, the hybrid approach achieved the highest score in the CRAG benchmark. In addition, our approach emphasizes the use of relatively small models with fewer than 10 billion parameters, promoting resource efficiency.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Know Or Not: a library for evaluating out-of-knowledge base robustness

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A leave-one-out evaluation methodology and library, knowornot, measure how often RAG-based QA chatbots abstain when the answer is removed from their knowledge base, with a PolicyBench benchmark showing abstention from...

  2. LLMQuoter: Enhancing RAG Capabilities Through Efficient Quote Extraction From Large Contexts

    cs.CL 2025-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    LLMQuoter uses a distilled 3B model to extract quotes for RAG; the paper shows gold quotes greatly improve QA, but does not test its own model's quotes end-to-end.

Pith tools