Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Model Swarms: Collaborative Search to Adapt LLM Experts via Swarm Intelligence

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.11163 v2 pith:2TWCXKMG submitted 2024-10-15 cs.CL

Model Swarms: Collaborative Search to Adapt LLM Experts via Swarm Intelligence

classification cs.CL
keywords modelexpertsswarmsadaptcollaborativesearchswarmacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose Model Swarms, a collaborative search algorithm to adapt LLMs via swarm intelligence, the collective behavior guiding individual systems. Specifically, Model Swarms starts with a pool of LLM experts and a utility function. Guided by the best-found checkpoints across models, diverse LLM experts collaboratively move in the weight space and optimize a utility function representing model adaptation objectives. Compared to existing model composition approaches, Model Swarms offers tuning-free model adaptation, works in low-data regimes with as few as 200 examples, and does not require assumptions about specific experts in the swarm or how they should be composed. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Model Swarms could flexibly adapt LLM experts to a single task, multi-task domains, reward models, as well as diverse human interests, improving over 12 model composition baselines by up to 21.0% across tasks and contexts. Further analysis reveals that LLM experts discover previously unseen capabilities in initial checkpoints and that Model Swarms enable the weak-to-strong transition of experts through the collaborative search process.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Weak-Link Optimization for Multi-Agent Reasoning and Collaboration

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    WORC improves multi-agent LLM reasoning to 82.2% average accuracy by predicting and compensating for the weakest agent via targeted extra sampling rather than uniform reinforcement.

  2. Beyond Scaling: Agents Are Heading to the Edge

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Personal agents require edge deployment to preserve high-fidelity local context and zero-latency loops, as claimed through three structural shifts away from cloud-centric designs.