Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Time-Series Foundation AI Model for Value-at-Risk Forecasting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.11773 v7 pith:OZAL6O6G submitted 2024-10-15 q-fin.RM cs.AI

classification q-fin.RMcs.AI
keywords modelfoundationbestdataforecastingmodelsquantilereturns
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This study is the first to analyze the performance of a time-series foundation AI model for Value-at-Risk (VaR), which essentially forecasts the left-tail quantiles of returns. Foundation models, pre-trained on diverse datasets, can be applied in a zero-shot setting with minimal data or further improved through finetuning. We compare Google's TimesFM model to conventional parametric and non-parametric models, including GARCH and Generalized Autoregressive Score (GAS), using 19 years of daily returns from the SP 100 index and its constituents. Backtesting with over 8.5 years of out-of-sample data shows that the fine-tuned foundation model consistently outperforms traditional methods in actual-over-expected ratios. For the quantile score loss function, it performs comparably to the best econometric model, GAS. Overall, the foundation model ranks as the best or among the top performers across the 0.01, 0.025, 0.05, and 0.1 quantile forecasting. Fine-tuning significantly improves accuracy, showing that zero-shot use is not optimal for VaR.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Forecasting Realized Volatility with Time Series Foundation Models: A Comparison with Econometric Benchmarks

    q-fin.ST 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Zero-shot time series foundation models largely fail to beat econometric benchmarks for realized volatility forecasting, with only TTM achieving a narrow, calibration-driven edge.

  2. Foundation Time-Series AI Model for Realized Volatility Forecasting

    q-fin.RM 2025-05 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Incremental fine-tuning of the TimesFM foundation model improves one-day-ahead realized volatility forecasts and beats HAR, ARFIMA, CHAR, and RGARCH benchmarks on average losses across 21 global equity indices.

Pith tools