Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

StyleDistance: Stronger Content-Independent Style Embeddings with Synthetic Parallel Examples

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.12757 v2 pith:EXLEQ2TR submitted 2024-10-16 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords stylestyledistanceembeddingsrepresentationscontentsyntheticcontent-independentcontrastive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Style representations aim to embed texts with similar writing styles closely and texts with different styles far apart, regardless of content. However, the contrastive triplets often used for training these representations may vary in both style and content, leading to potential content leakage in the representations. We introduce StyleDistance, a novel approach to training stronger content-independent style embeddings. We use a large language model to create a synthetic dataset of near-exact paraphrases with controlled style variations, and produce positive and negative examples across 40 distinct style features for precise contrastive learning. We assess the quality of our synthetic data and embeddings through human and automatic evaluations. StyleDistance enhances the content-independence of style embeddings, which generalize to real-world benchmarks and outperform leading style representations in downstream applications. Our model can be found at https://huggingface.co/StyleDistance/styledistance .

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Evaluating Style-Personalized Text Generation: Challenges and Directions

    cs.CL 2025-08 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new style-discrimination benchmark for personalized text generation shows ensemble metrics give only a marginal, possibly test-fitted, edge over the best single judge.

Pith tools