Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

CausalChat: Interactive Causal Model Development and Refinement Using Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.14146 v1 pith:U3GFH3GA submitted 2024-10-18 cs.AI cs.HCcs.LGcs.SI

classification cs.AIcs.HCcs.LGcs.SI
keywords causalnetworkscausalchatlargemodelvariablesapproachdetailed
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Causal networks are widely used in many fields to model the complex relationships between variables. A recent approach has sought to construct causal networks by leveraging the wisdom of crowds through the collective participation of humans. While this can yield detailed causal networks that model the underlying phenomena quite well, it requires a large number of individuals with domain understanding. We adopt a different approach: leveraging the causal knowledge that large language models, such as OpenAI's GPT-4, have learned by ingesting massive amounts of literature. Within a dedicated visual analytics interface, called CausalChat, users explore single variables or variable pairs recursively to identify causal relations, latent variables, confounders, and mediators, constructing detailed causal networks through conversation. Each probing interaction is translated into a tailored GPT-4 prompt and the response is conveyed through visual representations which are linked to the generated text for explanations. We demonstrate the functionality of CausalChat across diverse data contexts and conduct user studies involving both domain experts and laypersons.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LLM Cannot Discover Causality, and Should Be Restricted to Non-Decisional Support in Causal Discovery

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs are unreliable causal reasoners, so they should be limited to non-decisional search support in causal discovery algorithms.

  2. XplainAct: Visualization for Personalized Intervention Insights

    cs.HC 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    XplainAct combines choropleth maps, LIME/SHAP local explanations, and nearest-neighbor subgrouping to simulate and interpret personalized interventions at the county level.

Pith tools