Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Rationale Behind Essay Scores: Enhancing S-LLM's Multi-Trait Essay Scoring with Rationale Generated by LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.14202 v3 pith:MWZ7CBLR submitted 2024-10-18 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords scoringessayrmtsmodelmulti-traitrationalerationalesscores
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Existing automated essay scoring (AES) has solely relied on essay text without using explanatory rationales for the scores, thereby forgoing an opportunity to capture the specific aspects evaluated by rubric indicators in a fine-grained manner. This paper introduces Rationale-based Multiple Trait Scoring (RMTS), a novel approach for multi-trait essay scoring that integrates prompt-engineering-based large language models (LLMs) with a fine-tuning-based essay scoring model using a smaller large language model (S-LLM). RMTS uses an LLM-based trait-wise rationale generation system where a separate LLM agent generates trait-specific rationales based on rubric guidelines, which the scoring model uses to accurately predict multi-trait scores. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets, including ASAP, ASAP++, and Feedback Prize, show that RMTS significantly outperforms state-of-the-art models and vanilla S-LLMs in trait-specific scoring. By assisting quantitative assessment with fine-grained qualitative rationales, RMTS enhances the trait-wise reliability, providing partial explanations about essays. The code is available at https://github.com/BBeeChu/RMTS.git.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. WrAFT: a Modularized Automated Writing Evaluation System for Argumentative Essays

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    WrAFT, a modular LLM system, scores TOEFL essays with QWK 0.84/RMSE 0.44 and generates surface and deep feedback that human raters approve 93-96% of the time.

  2. Agreement Between Large Language Models and Human Raters in Essay Scoring: A Research Synthesis

    cs.CL 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Across 65 studies, LLM-human essay-score agreement mostly falls between 0.30 and 0.80, but the spread is wide, reporting is heterogeneous, and no pooled estimate is given.

Pith tools