Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Phenomenological AI Foundation Model for Physical Signals

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.14724 v1 pith:NRBKELFW submitted 2024-10-15 cs.LG cs.AIeess.SP

classification cs.LGcs.AIeess.SP
keywords modelphysicalfoundationacrossdiverseelectricalframeworkphenomena
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The objective of this work is to develop an AI foundation model for physical signals that can generalize across diverse phenomena, domains, applications, and sensing apparatuses. We propose a phenomenological approach and framework for creating and validating such AI foundation models. Based on this framework, we developed and trained a model on 0.59 billion samples of cross-modal sensor measurements, ranging from electrical current to fluid flow to optical sensors. Notably, no prior knowledge of physical laws or inductive biases were introduced into the model. Through several real-world experiments, we demonstrate that a single foundation model could effectively encode and predict physical behaviors, such as mechanical motion and thermodynamics, including phenomena not seen in training. The model also scales across physical processes of varying complexity, from tracking the trajectory of a simple spring-mass system to forecasting large electrical grid dynamics. This work highlights the potential of building a unified AI foundation model for diverse physical world processes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Putnam's Critical and Explanatory Tendencies Interpreted from a Machine Learning Perspective

    cs.CY 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper argues that Putnam's critical (prediction) and explanatory (explanation) tendencies in science necessarily depend on each other, and interprets this through the input-output structure of machine learning models.

Pith tools