REVIEW 1 cited by
Coarse-to-Fine Highlighting: Reducing Knowledge Hallucination in Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Generation of plausible but incorrect factual information, often termed hallucination, has attracted significant research interest. Retrieval-augmented language model (RALM) -- which enhances models with up-to-date knowledge -- emerges as a promising method to reduce hallucination. However, existing RALMs may instead exacerbate hallucination when retrieving lengthy contexts. To address this challenge, we propose COFT, a novel \textbf{CO}arse-to-\textbf{F}ine highligh\textbf{T}ing method to focus on different granularity-level key texts, thereby avoiding getting lost in lengthy contexts. Specifically, COFT consists of three components: \textit{recaller}, \textit{scorer}, and \textit{selector}. First, \textit{recaller} applies a knowledge graph to extract potential key entities in a given context. Second, \textit{scorer} measures the importance of each entity by calculating its contextual weight. Finally, \textit{selector} selects high contextual weight entities with a dynamic threshold algorithm and highlights the corresponding paragraphs, sentences, or words in a coarse-to-fine manner. Extensive experiments on the knowledge hallucination benchmark demonstrate the effectiveness of COFT, leading to a superior performance over $30\%$ in the F1 score metric. Moreover, COFT also exhibits remarkable versatility across various long-form tasks, such as reading comprehension and question answering.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Respecting Temporal-Causal Consistency: Entity-Event Knowledge Graphs for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
A mention-level entity-event knowledge graph for RAG modestly improves temporal-causal question answering on a new narrative benchmark, with gains mostly coming from adding HyDE-style hypothetical answers.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.