Pith. sign in

REVIEW 10 cited by

On the Diversity of Synthetic Data and its Impact on Training Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.15226 v2 pith:GP4L2ZNG submitted 2024-10-19 cs.CL

On the Diversity of Synthetic Data and its Impact on Training Large Language Models

classification cs.CL
keywords datadiversitysyntheticpre-trainingmodelsfine-tuningimpactlanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rise of Large Language Models (LLMs) has accentuated the need for diverse, high-quality pre-training data. Synthetic data emerges as a viable solution to the challenges of data scarcity and inaccessibility. While previous literature has focused predominantly on the quality and quantity of real data, our work enables the measurement of diversity in synthetic data and explores its impact on LLM performance. We study the downstream effects of synthetic data diversity during both the pre-training and fine-tuning stages by introducing a new diversity metric, \textit{LLM cluster-agent}, designed to evaluate the diversity of synthetic datasets. Through a series of controlled experiments with models of 350M and 1.4B parameters, we demonstrate that the proposed cluster-based LLM scoring of diversity correlates positively with both pre-training and supervised fine-tuning performance. Our findings also reveal that synthetic data diversity in pre-training affects supervised fine-tuning more significantly than pre-training itself, even for smaller models. We hope this study advances our understanding of the optimal use of synthetic data in LLM training and opens new avenues for efficient data generation processes.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 10 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. StepCodeReasoner: Aligning Code Reasoning with Stepwise Execution Traces via Reinforcement Learning

    cs.SE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    StepCodeReasoner aligns code reasoning with verifiable stepwise execution traces via print anchors and bi-level GRPO reinforcement learning, reaching SOTA results on CRUXEval (91.1%) and LiveCodeBench (86.5%) for a 7B model.

  2. Polyglot Teachers: Evaluating Language Models for Multilingual Synthetic Data Generation

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Gemma 3 27B and Aya Expanse 32B are effective multilingual teachers; data qualities such as diversity and fluency explain over 93% of variance in student performance rather than model size.

  3. Polyglot Teachers: Evaluating Language Models for Multilingual Synthetic Data Generation

    cs.CL 2026-04 accept novelty 7.0

    Gemma 3 27B and Aya Expanse 32B are the strongest multilingual synthetic-data teachers; model scale does not predict effectiveness while prompt diversity, length and response fluency do.

  4. Less is Enough: Synthesizing Diverse Data in LLM Feature Space with Sparse Autoencoders

    cs.CL 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    Coverage of sparse-autoencoder-identified task features predicts post-training performance and can guide synthesis of small, high-impact datasets (2,000 vs. 300,000 samples).

  5. Escaping Model Collapse via Synthetic Data Verification: Near-term Improvements and Long-term Convergence

    stat.ML 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    Verifier-filtered synthetic retraining improves linear-regression estimates in the short term but converges to the verifier's knowledge center, so sustained improvement requires an unbiased verifier.

  6. Synthetic Eggs in Many Baskets: The Impact of Synthetic Data Diversity on LLM Fine-Tuning

    cs.CL 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Fine-tuning LLMs on multi-source synthetic data mitigates distribution collapse and self-preference bias while increasing output quality relative to single-source or human-only fine-tuning.

  7. LLM Harms: A Taxonomy and Discussion

    cs.CY 2025-12 reject novelty 3.0

    Proposes a five-bucket taxonomy of LLM harms and calls for dynamic auditing, but the systematic review behind it is not reproducible and contains mismatched citations.

  8. LLM Harms: A Taxonomy and Discussion

    cs.CY 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    This paper proposes a taxonomy of LLM harms in five categories and suggests mitigation strategies plus a dynamic auditing system for responsible development.

  9. Bridging the Linguistic Divide: A Survey on Leveraging Large Language Models for Machine Translation

    cs.CL 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A literature survey that organizes prompting, fine-tuning, preference optimization, and context-aware techniques for LLM-based machine translation with emphasis on low-resource languages.

  10. Will LLMs Scaling Hit the Wall? Breaking Barriers via Distributed Resources on Massive Edge Devices

    cs.DC 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Position paper claiming that distributed training across massive edge devices can overcome data depletion and centralized compute monopolies in LLM scaling.