Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Generalizing Motion Planners with Mixture of Experts for Autonomous Driving

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.15774 v2 pith:FX6V6NHA submitted 2024-10-21 cs.RO cs.CV

classification cs.ROcs.CV
keywords drivingmotionplannersprevioustrainingapproachesarchitectureautonomous
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large real-world driving datasets have sparked significant research into various aspects of data-driven motion planners for autonomous driving. These include data augmentation, model architecture, reward design, training strategies, and planner pipelines. These planners promise better generalizations on complicated and few-shot cases than previous methods. However, experiment results show that many of these approaches produce limited generalization abilities in planning performance due to overly complex designs or training paradigms. In this paper, we review and benchmark previous methods focusing on generalizations. The experimental results indicate that as models are appropriately scaled, many design elements become redundant. We introduce StateTransformer-2 (STR2), a scalable, decoder-only motion planner that uses a Vision Transformer (ViT) encoder and a mixture-of-experts (MoE) causal Transformer architecture. The MoE backbone addresses modality collapse and reward balancing by expert routing during training. Extensive experiments on the NuPlan dataset show that our method generalizes better than previous approaches across different test sets and closed-loop simulations. Furthermore, we assess its scalability on billions of real-world urban driving scenarios, demonstrating consistent accuracy improvements as both data and model size grow.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Plan-R1: Safe and Feasible Trajectory Planning as Language Modeling

    cs.RO 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    By replacing group normalization in GRPO with fixed scaling, Plan-R1 keeps safety violations dominant in the learning signal and achieves state-of-the-art reactive planning scores on nuPlan.

  2. GEMINUS: Dual-aware Global and Scene-Adaptive Mixture-of-Experts for End-to-End Autonomous Driving

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    GEMINUS reports state-of-the-art closed-loop driving scores on Bench2Drive with a monocular camera by routing each situation to either a global expert or a scene-specialized expert based on scenario confidence.

Pith tools