Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Do Large Language Models Have an English Accent? Evaluating and Improving the Naturalness of Multilingual LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.15956 v3 pith:2JVDJNLJ submitted 2024-10-21 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords multilinguallanguagellmsnaturalnessmetricsoutputsenglishenglish-centric
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Current Large Language Models (LLMs) are predominantly designed with English as the primary language, and even the few that are multilingual tend to exhibit strong English-centric biases. Much like speakers who might produce awkward expressions when learning a second language, LLMs often generate unnatural outputs in non-English languages, reflecting English-centric patterns in both vocabulary and grammar. Despite the importance of this issue, the naturalness of multilingual LLM outputs has received limited attention. In this paper, we address this gap by introducing novel automatic corpus-level metrics to assess the lexical and syntactic naturalness of LLM outputs in a multilingual context. Using our new metrics, we evaluate state-of-the-art LLMs on a curated benchmark in French and Chinese, revealing a tendency towards English-influenced patterns. To mitigate this issue, we also propose a simple and effective alignment method to improve the naturalness of an LLM in a target language and domain, achieving consistent improvements in naturalness without compromising the performance on general-purpose benchmarks. Our work highlights the importance of developing multilingual metrics, resources and methods for the new wave of multilingual LLMs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Alvorada-Bench: Can Language Models Solve Brazilian University Entrance Exams?

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Language models now exceed 94% accuracy on Brazilian entrance exams, but still lag on mathematics and specialized engineering exams.

Pith tools