REVIEW 8 cited by
Beyond Browsing: API-Based Web Agents
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Web browsers are a portal to the internet, where much of human activity is undertaken. Thus, there has been significant research work in AI agents that interact with the internet through web browsing. However, there is also another interface designed specifically for machine interaction with online content: application programming interfaces (APIs). In this paper we ask -- what if we were to take tasks traditionally tackled by Browsing Agents, and give AI agents access to APIs? To do so, we propose two varieties of agents: (1) an API-calling agent that attempts to perform online tasks through APIs only, similar to traditional coding agents, and (2) a Hybrid Agent that can interact with online data through both web browsing and APIs. In experiments on WebArena, a widely-used and realistic benchmark for web navigation tasks, we find that API-Based Agents outperform web Browsing Agents. Hybrid Agents out-perform both others nearly uniformly across tasks, resulting in a more than 24.0% absolute improvement over web browsing alone, achieving a success rate of 38.9%, the SOTA performance among task-agnostic agents. These results strongly suggest that when APIs are available, they present an attractive alternative to relying on web browsing alone.
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
Web Agents Should Adopt the Plan-Then-Execute Paradigm
Web agents should default to planning a complete task program before observing live web content to reduce prompt injection exposure, since WebArena tasks are compatible and 80% need no runtime LLM calls.
-
Memory in the Age of AI Agents
The paper maps agent memory research via three forms (token-level, parametric, latent), three functions (factual, experiential, working), and dynamics of formation/evolution/retrieval, plus benchmarks and future directions.
-
Experience-Evolving Multi-Turn Tool-Use Agent with Hybrid Episodic-Procedural Memory
An LLM agent that builds a tool-transition graph with state summaries from past experience improves tool selection and RL exploration by large margins on multi-turn benchmarks.
-
MGA: Memory-Driven GUI Agent for Observation-Centric Interaction
MGA is a memory-driven GUI agent that uses an observer for bias-free screen reading and structured memory for compact state transitions to enable efficient long-horizon automation.
-
Doc2Agent: Scalable Generation of Tool-Using Agents from API Documentation
Doc2Agent automatically converts unstructured REST API documentation into validated, Python-based tools for AI agents, reporting a 55% relative WebArena improvement over direct API calling.
-
Branch-and-Browse: Efficient and Controllable Web Exploration with Tree-Structured Reasoning and Action Memory
Branch-and-Browse, a tree-structured web agent with page-level action memory, reports 35.8% success and up to 40.4% less time than the cited Tree Search baseline on WebArena.
-
Cybernaut: Towards Reliable Web Automation
A demonstration-to-SOP framework plus robust element identification and a trace similarity metric improves enterprise web automation success rates on an internal benchmark, with a fine-tuned consistency classifier rea...
-
Large Language Model-Brained GUI Agents: A Survey
A survey consolidating frameworks, data practices, large action models, benchmarks, applications, and research gaps in LLM-brained GUI agents.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.