REVIEW 8 cited by
ClimaQA: An Automated Evaluation Framework for Climate Question Answering Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
ClimaQA: An Automated Evaluation Framework for Climate Question Answering Models
read the original abstract
The use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in climate science has recently gained significant attention. However, a critical issue remains: the lack of a comprehensive evaluation framework capable of assessing the quality and scientific validity of model outputs. To address this issue, we develop ClimaGen (Climate QA Generator), an adaptive learning framework that generates question-answer pairs from graduate textbooks with climate scientists in the loop. As a result, we present ClimaQA-Gold, an expert-annotated benchmark dataset alongside ClimaQA-Silver, a large-scale, comprehensive synthetic QA dataset for climate science. Finally, we develop evaluation strategies and compare different LLMs on our benchmarks. Our results offer novel insights into various approaches used to enhance knowledge of climate LLMs. The source code is publicly available at https://github.com/Rose-STL-Lab/genie-climaqa
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
ReCrit: Transition-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Scientific Critic Reasoning
ReCrit frames critic interaction as a correctness-transition problem and uses quadrant-based RL rewards to improve LLM performance on scientific reasoning benchmarks by rewarding corrections and robustness while penal...
-
Reasoning4Sciences: Bridging Reasoning Language Models to All Scientific Branches
Survey of RLM adoption in 28 disciplines reveals maturity disparities via a new assessment framework, with focus on development, evaluation, and public resources.
-
Reasoning4Sciences: Bridging Reasoning Language Models to All Scientific Branches
A survey of RLM use in 28 disciplines reveals uneven adoption and introduces a maturity assessment framework showing larger gaps when limited to public resources.
-
Reasoning4Sciences: Bridging Reasoning Language Models to All Scientific Branches
A survey of reasoning language model adoption across 28 ERC scientific disciplines finds large maturity gaps, especially when only public resources are counted.
-
OpenCompass: A Universal Evaluation Platform for Large Language Models
OpenCompass is a modular, high-concurrency platform for unified LLM evaluation across knowledge, reasoning, code, and other domains with support for rule-based, LLM-as-judge, and cascaded evaluators.
-
OpenCompass: A Universal Evaluation Platform for Large Language Models
OpenCompass is presented as a one-stop, scalable, high-concurrency LLM evaluation platform with modular architecture supporting multiple domains and evaluator types.
-
Earth Science Foundation Models: From Perception to Reasoning and Discovery
The paper delivers a unified review and roadmap of Earth science foundation models, structured by capability depth from perception to agentic reasoning and by application breadth across atmosphere, hydrosphere, lithos...
-
Earth Science Foundation Models: From Perception to Reasoning and Discovery
A review of Earth science foundation models covering capability evolution from perception to discovery, applications across atmosphere/hydrosphere/lithosphere/biosphere/anthroposphere/cryosphere, over 200 datasets, an...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.