Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Quantifying the Risks of Tool-assisted Rephrasing to Linguistic Diversity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.17670 v1 pith:7ENOJ2AS submitted 2024-10-23 cs.CL

Quantifying the Risks of Tool-assisted Rephrasing to Linguistic Diversity

classification cs.CL
keywords changelanguagelargequantifyingrephrasingtextadoptedassistants
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Writing assistants and large language models see widespread use in the creation of text content. While their effectiveness for individual users has been evaluated in the literature, little is known about their proclivity to change language or reduce its richness when adopted by a large user base. In this paper, we take a first step towards quantifying this risk by measuring the semantic and vocabulary change enacted by the use of rephrasing tools on a multi-domain corpus of human-generated text.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.