Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Hybrid Quantum-Classical Feature Extraction approach for Image Classification using Autoencoders and Quantum SVMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.18814 v1 pith:WZJSN47V submitted 2024-10-24 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords quantummachineimagedatasetlearningautoencoderclassicalclassification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In order to leverage quantum computers for machine learning tasks such as image classification, careful consideration is required: NISQ-era quantum computers have limitations, which include noise, scalability, read-in and read-out times, and gate operation times. Therefore, strategies should be devised to mitigate the impact that complex datasets can have on the overall efficiency of a quantum machine learning pipeline. This may otherwise lead to excessive resource demands or increased noise. We apply a classical feature extraction method using a ResNet10-inspired convolutional autoencoder to both reduce the dimensionality of the dataset and extract abstract and meaningful features before feeding them into a quantum machine learning block. The quantum block of choice is a quantum-enhanced support vector machine (QSVM), as support vector machines typically do not require large sample sizes to identify patterns in data and have short-depth quantum circuits, which limits the impact of noise. The autoencoder is trained to extract meaningful features through image reconstruction, aiming to minimize the mean squared error across a training set. Three image datasets are used to illustrate the pipeline: HTRU-1, MNIST, and CIFAR-10. We also include a quantum-enhanced one-class support vector machine (QOCSVM) for the highly unbalanced HTRU-1 set, as well as classical machine learning results to serve as a benchmark. Finally, the HTRU-2 dataset is also included to serve as a benchmark for a dataset with well-correlated features. The autoencoder achieved near-perfect reconstruction and high classification accuracy for MNIST, while CIFAR-10 showed poorer performance due to image complexity, and HTRU-1 struggled because of dataset imbalance. This highlights the need for a balance between dimensionality reduction through classical feature extraction and prediction performance using quantum methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Machine learning development for quantum computing and neutrino physics

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    QELM classifiers plateau at accuracy matching random quantum circuits via local, classically simulable entanglement, while a timing-aware ResNet-18 distinguishes single-vertex from pile-up Hyper-K IWCD events at near-...

  2. Quantum kernel and HHL-based support vector machines for multi-class classification

    quant-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    On a reduced SDSS dataset, quantum-kernel QSVM outperforms HHL LS-SVM, classical SVMs are slightly ahead, and the HHL method's constant scaling stems from using only two class-average representatives.

Pith tools