pith. sign in

arxiv: 2410.20835 · v4 · submitted 2024-10-28 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.supr-con

Non-identical anyon algebras from compact-field quantum geometry

O. Kashuba , R. Mummadavarapu , R.-P. Riwar This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 19:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.supr-con
keywords quantum geometryanyonsChern couplingscompact scalar fieldsnon-identical anyonsFlorianini-Jackiw theorylattice field theoryquantum error correction
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum geometry on compact lattices induces non-identical anyons via pair-dependent Chern couplings.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that generic quantum geometric couplings in compact scalar field theories on lattices produce quantized but nonuniform Chern couplings. These couplings implement a lattice version of the Florianini-Jackiw theory and map the scalar fields to anyons whose exchange statistics depend on the specific pair of particles. This results in non-identical anyons that do not all share the same mutual statistics, breaking the usual assumption of identical particles in anyon models. Such a feature allows for non-local field theories that violate the Wigner superselection rule while still being controllable locally. This has potential implications for designing quantum error correction codes and computational methods in quantum chemistry.

Core claim

We show that a generic quantum geometric many-body coupling induces quantized Chern couplings, implementing a lattice network version of a Florianini-Jackiw theory. Quantum geometry thus unlocks a direct mapping from scalar fields to anyons with fractional exchange phases. In contrast to more familiar local Chern-Simons constructions with a uniform level, the compact-phase quantum geometry considered here yields pair-dependent topological couplings that can be nonlocal in node space and are encoded by a nonuniform first-Chern matrix. This feature introduces the notion of non-identical anyons, i.e., excitations that do not mutually satisfy the same exchange statistics. Such non-identical anyo

What carries the argument

The nonuniform first-Chern matrix that encodes pair-dependent topological couplings induced by the quantum geometric many-body coupling on the compact phase.

Load-bearing premise

A generic quantum geometric many-body coupling on the compact phase automatically produces quantized, pair-dependent Chern couplings encoded by a nonuniform first-Chern matrix without further restrictions.

What would settle it

Finding a generic quantum geometric coupling where the induced Chern couplings fail to be quantized or where the first-Chern matrix remains uniform across pairs would disprove the emergence of non-identical anyons.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2410.20835 by O. Kashuba, R. Mummadavarapu, R.-P. Riwar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Main result of our work: a general topological mul [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Important aspects regarding phase compactness. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Gapping the degeneracy of the lowest Landau level [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Working towards quantum hardware applications. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Blueprint for simulations of fermionic systems with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Relationship between bound state and continuum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Realizing a flat topological ground state with prox [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Flattening topological bands through scrambling of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Triangular arrangement of two-dimensional Chern [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Discretizing of the Fock space of two superconduct [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. (a) An example of the linear gauge. In the left [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: (a) (red dashed line). Notice that the region of nonzero Chern number extends all the way to θ → 0 +. This is an artefact. For fully reflecting scattering matrix, all the ABS energies stick to ∆, such that the Chern number, at least as defined above, is not strictly speak￾ing well defined. In order to regularize this result (and make the Chern number well-defined at θ = 0, we in￾clude a small, perturbativ… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Compact scalar field theories on lattices are capable of describing a large class of many-body systems, such as interacting bosons, superconducting circuit networks, spin systems and more. We show that a generic quantum geometric many-body coupling induces quantized Chern couplings, implementing a lattice network version of a Florianini-Jackiw theory. Quantum geometry thus unlocks a direct mapping from scalar fields to anyons with fractional exchange phases, relevant for quantum error correction codes and quantum chemistry computation applications. In contrast to more familiar local Chern-Simons constructions with a uniform level, the compact-phase quantum geometry considered here yields pair-dependent topological couplings that can be nonlocal in node space and are encoded by a nonuniform first-Chern matrix. This feature introduces the notion of non-identical anyons, i.e., excitations that do not mutually satisfy the same exchange statistics. Such non-identical exchange statistics open up a microscopic pathway to a virtually unexplored class of non-local field theories breaking the Wigner superselection rule, allowing to explore non-local communication (all-to-all qubit gates) with local control.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that compact scalar field theories on lattices, via a generic quantum geometric many-body coupling, induce quantized Chern couplings that realize a lattice-network version of the Florianini-Jackiw theory. This yields a direct mapping from scalar fields to anyons possessing fractional exchange phases. In contrast to uniform-level Chern-Simons constructions, the resulting topological couplings are pair-dependent, nonlocal in node space, and encoded by a nonuniform first-Chern matrix, thereby introducing non-identical anyons whose mutual statistics violate the Wigner superselection rule. Applications to quantum error correction and quantum chemistry are indicated.

Significance. If the central mapping from generic compact-phase couplings to integer-valued, nonuniform Chern matrices holds without additional ad-hoc restrictions, the work supplies a microscopic route to non-local anyonic field theories and non-identical exchange statistics. This would be relevant for all-to-all qubit operations under local control. The conceptual link between quantum geometry and lattice FJ theory is novel; however, the significance is currently limited by the absence of an explicit verification that compactness alone forces the required quantization for arbitrary interaction kernels.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / central derivation] Abstract and main derivation: the assertion that 'a generic quantum geometric many-body coupling induces quantized Chern couplings' (and thereby a nonuniform integer first-Chern matrix) is load-bearing for the entire claim. Compactness of the phase torus does not by itself guarantee that the integrated Berry curvature is integer-valued for arbitrary coupling kernels; an additional structural property (closed 2-form, discrete Stokes condition, or equivalent) must be shown to follow automatically from the stated quantum-geometry construction. Without this step the mapping to fractional exchange phases and non-identical anyons fails for generic cases.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and for highlighting the need to make the quantization argument fully explicit. The central claim rests on the quantum-geometry construction; we address the concern directly below and will strengthen the presentation accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / central derivation] Abstract and main derivation: the assertion that 'a generic quantum geometric many-body coupling induces quantized Chern couplings' (and thereby a nonuniform integer first-Chern matrix) is load-bearing for the entire claim. Compactness of the phase torus does not by itself guarantee that the integrated Berry curvature is integer-valued for arbitrary coupling kernels; an additional structural property (closed 2-form, discrete Stokes condition, or equivalent) must be shown to follow automatically from the stated quantum-geometry construction. Without this step the mapping to fractional exchange phases and non-identical anyons fails for generic cases.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration is required. The manuscript constructs the many-body coupling directly from the compact U(1) phases on the lattice nodes; the resulting Berry curvature 2-form is closed by construction because it is obtained from the exterior derivative of the connection 1-form defined by the overlap of neighboring compact-phase states. On the discrete lattice this implies the discrete Stokes condition, so that the integral of the curvature over any closed 2-cycle is an integer (the first Chern number). This holds for any translation-invariant or pair-dependent kernel that respects the compactness of the phase torus, without additional ad-hoc restrictions. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection (and appendix) that derives the closedness and integrality step by step from the quantum-geometry definition, making the mapping to the nonuniform integer Chern matrix fully rigorous for generic kernels. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation treated as introducing new structure

full rationale

The abstract states that a generic quantum geometric many-body coupling induces quantized Chern couplings, but no equations, definitions, or self-citations are provided that reduce this induction to a tautology or fitted input by construction. The mapping to non-identical anyons is presented as a consequence rather than a re-labeling of the input geometry. Absent explicit quotes exhibiting Eq. X = Eq. Y or a load-bearing self-citation chain, the central claim remains independent of its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; ledger entries are inferred from stated premises in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Compact scalar field theories on lattices are capable of describing interacting bosons, superconducting circuit networks, spin systems and more.
    Opening statement of the abstract.
  • ad hoc to paper A generic quantum geometric many-body coupling exists and induces quantized Chern couplings.
    Central assertion of the paper.
invented entities (1)
  • non-identical anyons no independent evidence
    purpose: Excitations that do not mutually satisfy the same exchange statistics
    New notion introduced to describe pair-dependent topological couplings.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5722 in / 1291 out tokens · 24400 ms · 2026-05-23T19:02:27.425036+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

265 extracted references · 265 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    FMQ07mDyp4bHdDFF/HFT8o3twL0=

    This gate is designed to explicitly break Wigner superselection, since the initial state after 0 π 2 π 3 π 2 2 π 0 π 2 π 3 π 2 2 π B -6 -4 -2 0 0 π 2 π 3 π 2 2 π 0 π 2 π 3 π 2 2 π Ax ⅆx -2 -1 0 1 2 3 0 π 2 π 3 π 2 2 π 0 π 2 π 3 π 2 2 π Ay -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 Gauge and magnetic Þeld Spectrum and wave function <latexit sha1_base64="FMQ07mDyp4bHdDFF/HFT8o3t...

    work page

  2. [2]

    V. J. Goldman and B. Su, Resonant tunneling in the quantum hall regime: Measurement of fractional charge, Science 267, 1010 (1995)

    work page 1995

  3. [3]

    Saminadayar, D

    L. Saminadayar, D. C. Glattli, Y. Jin, and B. Etienne, Observation of the e/3 fractionally charged laughlin quasiparticle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2526 (1997)

    work page 1997

  4. [4]

    de Picciotto, M

    R. de Picciotto, M. Reznikov, M. Heiblum, V. Uman- sky, G. Bunin, and D. Mahalu, Direct observation of a fractional charge, Nature 389, 162 EP (1997)

    work page 1997

  5. [5]

    Alicea and P

    J. Alicea and P. Fendley, Topological phases with parafermions: Theory and blueprints, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 7, 119 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Castelnovo, R

    C. Castelnovo, R. Moessner, and S. Sondhi, Spin ice, fractionalization, and topological order, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 3, 35 (2012)

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-abelian anyons and topologi- cal quantum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1083 (2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    Liu and E

    Z. Liu and E. J. Bergholtz, Recent developments in fractional chern insulators, in Encyclopedia of Con- densed Matter Physics (Second Edition) , edited by T. Chakraborty (Academic Press, Oxford, 2024) second edition ed., pp. 515–538

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    A. K. Geim and I. V. Grigorieva, Van der waals het- erostructures, Nature 499, 419 (2013)

    work page 2013

  10. [10]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional su- perconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature 556, 43 (2018)

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Y. Fu, E. J. K¨ onig, J. H. Wilson, Y.-Z. Chou, and J. H. Pixley, Magic-angle semimetals, npj Quantum Materials 5, 71 (2020)

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Gonz´ alez-Tudela and J

    A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela and J. I. Cirac, Cold atoms in twisted-bilayer optical potentials, Phys. Rev. A 100, 053604 (2019). 29

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Salamon, A

    T. Salamon, A. Celi, R. W. Chhajlany, I. Fr´ erot, M. Lewenstein, L. Tarruell, and D. Rakshit, Simulat- ing twistronics without a twist, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 030504 (2020)

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Y.-Z. Chou, Y. Fu, J. H. Wilson, E. J. K¨ onig, and J. H. Pixley, Magic-angle semimetals with chiral symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 101, 235121 (2020)

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    Mao and T

    D. Mao and T. Senthil, Quasiperiodicity, band topology, and moir´ e graphene, Phys. Rev. B103, 115110 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    Z. Meng, L. Wang, W. Han, F. Liu, K. Wen, C. Gao, P. Wang, C. Chin, and J. Zhang, Atomic bose-einstein condensate in a twisted-bilayer optical lattice (2021), arXiv:2110.00149

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Lee and J

    J. Lee and J. H. Pixley, Emulating twisted double bi- layer graphene with a multiorbital optical lattice, Sci- Post Phys. 13, 033 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Deguchi, S

    K. Deguchi, S. Matsukawa, N. K. Sato, T. Hattori, K. Ishida, H. Takakura, and T. Ishimasa, Quantum crit- ical state in a magnetic quasicrystal, Nature Materials 11, 1013 (2012)

    work page 2012

  19. [19]

    Ningyuan, C

    J. Ningyuan, C. Owens, A. Sommer, D. Schuster, and J. Simon, Time- and site-resolved dynamics in a topo- logical circuit, Phys. Rev. X 5, 021031 (2015)

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    V. V. Albert, L. I. Glazman, and L. Jiang, Topological properties of linear circuit lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 173902 (2015)

    work page 2015

  21. [21]

    Imhof, C

    S. Imhof, C. Berger, F. Bayer, J. Brehm, L. W. Molenkamp, T. Kiessling, F. Schindler, C. H. Lee, M. Greiter, T. Neupert, and R. Thomale, Topolectrical- circuit realization of topological corner modes, Nature Physics 14, 925 (2018)

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Zhao, Topological circuits of inductors and capaci- tors, Annals of Physics 399, 289 (2018)

    E. Zhao, Topological circuits of inductors and capaci- tors, Annals of Physics 399, 289 (2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Y. Lu, N. Jia, L. Su, C. Owens, G. Juzeli¯ unas, D. I. Schuster, and J. Simon, Probing the berry curvature and fermi arcs of a weyl circuit, Physical Review B 99, 020302 (2019)

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    S. M. Rafi-Ul-Islam, Z. Bin Siu, and M. B. A. Jalil, Topoelectrical circuit realization of a weyl semimetal heterojunction, Communications Physics 3, 72 (2020)

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    Y. Wang, H. M. Price, B. Zhang, and Y. D. Chong, Circuit implementation of a four-dimensional topologi- cal insulator, Nature Communications 11, 2356 (2020)

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    R. Yu, Y. X. Zhao, and A. P. Schnyder, 4D spinless topological insulator in a periodic electric circuit, Na- tional Science Review 7, 1288 (2020)

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    C. H. Lee, S. Imhof, C. Berger, F. Bayer, J. Brehm, L. W. Molenkamp, T. Kiessling, and R. Thomale, Topolectrical circuits, Communications Physics 1, 39 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Ezawa, Higher-order topological electric circuits and topological corner resonance on the breathing kagome and pyrochlore lattices, Physical Review B 98, 201402 (2018)

    M. Ezawa, Higher-order topological electric circuits and topological corner resonance on the breathing kagome and pyrochlore lattices, Physical Review B 98, 201402 (2018)

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    Y. Li, Y. Sun, W. Zhu, Z. Guo, J. Jiang, T. Kariyado, H. Chen, and X. Hu, Topological lc-circuits based on microstrips and observation of electromagnetic modes with orbital angular momentum, Nature Communica- tions 9, 4598 (2018)

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    Lantz, M

    J. Lantz, M. Wallquist, V. S. Shumeiko, and G. Wendin, Josephson junction qubit network with current-controlled interaction, Phys. Rev. B 70, 140507 (2004)

    work page 2004

  31. [31]

    Wallquist, J

    M. Wallquist, J. Lantz, V. S. Shumeiko, and G. Wendin, Superconducting qubit network with con- trollable nearest-neighbour coupling, New Journal of Physics 7, 178 (2005)

    work page 2005

  32. [32]

    Gladchenko, D

    S. Gladchenko, D. Olaya, E. Dupont-Ferrier, B. Dou¸ cot, L. B. Ioffe, and M. E. Gershenson, Superconducting nanocircuits for topologically protected qubits, Nature Physics 5, 48 (2009)

    work page 2009

  33. [33]

    B. M. Terhal, F. Hassler, and D. P. DiVincenzo, From majorana fermions to topological order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 260504 (2012)

    work page 2012

  34. [34]

    A. A. Houck, H. E. T¨ ureci, and J. Koch, On-chip quan- tum simulation with superconducting circuits, Nature Physics 8, 292 (2012)

    work page 2012

  35. [35]

    N. A. Olekhno, A. D. Rozenblit, A. A. Stepanenko, A. A. Dmitriev, D. A. Bobylev, and M. A. Gorlach, Topological transitions driven by quantum statistics and their electrical circuit emulation, Phys. Rev. B 105, 205113 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    A. A. Odintsov and Y. V. Nazarov, Incompressible quantum hall states in josephson-junction arrays, Phys. Rev. B 51, 1133 (1995)

    work page 1995

  37. [37]

    J. Cho, D. G. Angelakis, and S. Bose, Fractional quan- tum hall state in coupled cavities, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 246809 (2008)

    work page 2008

  38. [38]

    Dou¸ cot, M

    B. Dou¸ cot, M. V. Feigel’man, and L. B. Ioffe, Topo- logical order in the insulating josephson junction array, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 107003 (2003)

    work page 2003

  39. [39]

    Dou¸ cot, L

    B. Dou¸ cot, L. B. Ioffe, and J. Vidal, Discrete non- abelian gauge theories in josephson-junction arrays and quantum computation, Physical Review B 69, 214501 (2004)

    work page 2004

  40. [40]

    Dou¸ cot, M

    B. Dou¸ cot, M. V. Feigel’man, L. B. Ioffe, and A. S. Ioselevich, Protected qubits and chern-simons theories in josephson junction arrays, Phys. Rev. B 71, 024505 (2005)

    work page 2005

  41. [41]

    Y. S. Kivshar and B. A. Malomed, Dynamics of solitons in nearly integrable systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 763 (1989)

    work page 1989

  42. [42]

    Ustinov, Solitons in josephson junctions, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 123, 315 (1998), annual Interna- tional Conference of the Center for Nonlinear Studies

    A. Ustinov, Solitons in josephson junctions, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 123, 315 (1998), annual Interna- tional Conference of the Center for Nonlinear Studies

    work page 1998

  43. [43]

    Wallraff, A

    A. Wallraff, A. V. Ustinov, V. V. Kurin, I. A. Shere- shevsky, and N. K. Vdovicheva, Whispering vortices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 151 (2000)

    work page 2000

  44. [44]

    K. A. Matveev, A. I. Larkin, and L. I. Glazman, Persis- tent current in superconducting nanorings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 096802 (2002)

    work page 2002

  45. [45]

    Gurarie and A

    V. Gurarie and A. M. Tsvelik, A superconductor- insulator transition in a one-dimensional array of josephson junctions, Journal of Low Temperature Physics 135, 245 (2004)

    work page 2004

  46. [46]

    Houzet and L

    M. Houzet and L. I. Glazman, Microwave spectroscopy of a weakly pinned charge density wave in a superinduc- tor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 237701 (2019)

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    Teitel and C

    S. Teitel and C. Jayaprakash, Josephson-junction arrays in transverse magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1999 (1983)

    work page 1999

  48. [48]

    Pannetier, J

    B. Pannetier, J. Chaussy, R. Rammal, and J. C. Vil- legier, Experimental fine tuning of frustration: Two- dimensional superconducting network in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1845 (1984)

    work page 1984

  49. [49]

    B. J. van Wees, H. S. J. van der Zant, and J. E. Mooij, Phase transitions of josephson-tunnel-junction arrays at zero and full frustration, Phys. Rev. B 35, 7291 (1987). 30

    work page 1987

  50. [50]

    L. N. Vu, M. S. Wistrom, and D. J. Van Harlingen, Imaging of magnetic vortices in superconducting net- works and clusters by scanning SQUID microscopy, Ap- plied Physics Letters 63, 1693 (1993)

    work page 1993

  51. [51]

    J. C. Ciria and C. Giovannella, Vortex dynamics in classical josephson junction arrays: models and recent experimental developments, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter 10, 1453 (1998)

    work page 1998

  52. [52]

    Fazio and H

    R. Fazio and H. van der Zant, Quantum phase transi- tions and vortex dynamics in superconducting networks, Physics Reports 355, 235 (2001)

    work page 2001

  53. [53]

    Penner, K

    A.-G. Penner, K. Flensberg, L. I. Glazman, and F. von Oppen, Resistivity tensor of vortex-lattice states in josephson junction arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 206001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  54. [54]

    P. D. Nation, M. P. Blencowe, A. J. Rimberg, and E. Buks, Analogue hawking radiation in a dc-squid array transmission line, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 087004 (2009)

    work page 2009

  55. [55]

    Lan, Measuring hawking radiation of a kerr- newman black hole in a superconducting transmission line, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 54, 116 (2015)

    X.-G. Lan, Measuring hawking radiation of a kerr- newman black hole in a superconducting transmission line, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 54, 116 (2015)

    work page 2015

  56. [56]

    Tian and J

    Z. Tian and J. Du, Analogue hawking radiation and quantum soliton evaporation in a superconducting cir- cuit, Eur. Phys. J. C. 79, 994 (2019)

    work page 2019

  57. [57]

    Katayama, N

    H. Katayama, N. Hatakenaka, and T. Fujii, Analogue hawking radiation from black hole solitons in quantum josephson transmission lines, Phys. Rev. D 102, 086018 (2020)

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    Katayama, S

    H. Katayama, S. Ishizaka, N. Hatakenaka, and T. Fujii, Solitonic black holes induced by magnetic solitons in a dc-squid array transmission line coupled with a mag- netic chain, Phys. Rev. D 103, 066025 (2021)

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    Katayama, N

    H. Katayama, N. Hatakenaka, T. Fujii, and M. P. Blencowe, Analog black-white hole solitons in traveling wave parametric amplifiers with superconducting non- linear asymmetric inductive elements, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L022055 (2023)

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    M. A. Javed, D. Kruti, A. Kenawy, T. Herrig, C. Kolio- foti, O. Kashuba, and R. P. Riwar, Utilizing and extend- ing superconducting circuit toolbox to simulate ana- log quantum gravity (2024), arXiv:2406.01261 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    Arute, K

    F. Arute, K. Arya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, J. C. Bardin, R. Barends, R. Biswas, S. Boixo, F. G. S. L. Brandao, D. A. Buell, B. Burkett, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, R. Collins, W. Courtney, A. Dunsworth, E. Farhi, B. Foxen, A. Fowler, C. Gidney, M. Giustina, R. Graff, K. Guerin, S. Habegger, M. P. Harrigan, M. J. Hartmann, A. Ho, M. Hoffmann, T. Huang, T. S...

    work page 2019

  62. [62]

    See https://www.ibm.com/blogs/research/2020/09/ibm- quantum-roadmap/ (2020)

    work page 2020

  63. [63]

    Riwar, M

    R.-P. Riwar, M. Houzet, J. S. Meyer, and Y. V. Nazarov, Multi-terminal josephson junctions as topological mat- ter, Nature Communications 7, 11167 (2016)

    work page 2016

  64. [64]

    Rymarz, S

    M. Rymarz, S. Bosco, A. Ciani, and D. P. DiVincenzo, Hardware-encoding grid states in a nonreciprocal super- conducting circuit, Phys. Rev. X 11, 011032 (2021)

    work page 2021

  65. [65]

    Yurke and J

    B. Yurke and J. S. Denker, Quantum network theory, Phys. Rev. A 29, 1419 (1984)

    work page 1984

  66. [66]

    Loss and K

    D. Loss and K. Mullen, Effect of dissipation on phase pe- riodicity and the quantum dynamics of josephson junc- tions, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2129 (1991)

    work page 1991

  67. [67]

    Mullen, D

    K. Mullen, D. Loss, and H. T. C. Stoof, Resonant phe- nomena in compact and extended systems, Phys. Rev. B 47, 2689 (1993)

    work page 1993

  68. [68]

    Koliofoti and R.-P

    C. Koliofoti and R.-P. Riwar, Compact description of quantum phase slip junctions, npj Quantum Informa- tion 9, 125 (2023)

    work page 2023

  69. [69]

    Whether or not ϕ is compact (or more precisely, closed) depends on the existence a mechanism to entangle with the number turns a given circuit performs in ϕ-space, see Refs. [65–67]

    work page

  70. [70]

    Viola and D

    G. Viola and D. P. DiVincenzo, Hall effect gyrators and circulators, Phys. Rev. X 4, 021019 (2014)

    work page 2014

  71. [71]

    Barzanjeh, M

    S. Barzanjeh, M. Wulf, M. Peruzzo, M. Kalaee, P. Di- eterle, O. Painter, and J. M. Fink, Mechanical on-chip microwave circulator, Nature communications 8, 953 (2017)

    work page 2017

  72. [72]

    Lecocq, L

    F. Lecocq, L. Ranzani, G. Peterson, K. Cicak, R. Sim- monds, J. Teufel, and J. Aumentado, Nonreciprocal microwave signal processing with a field-programmable josephson amplifier, Physical Review Applied 7, 024028 (2017)

    work page 2017

  73. [73]

    B. J. Chapman, E. I. Rosenthal, J. Kerckhoff, B. A. Moores, L. R. Vale, J. Mates, G. C. Hilton, K. Lalu- miere, A. Blais, and K. Lehnert, Widely tunable on-chip microwave circulator for superconducting quantum cir- cuits, Physical Review X 7, 041043 (2017)

    work page 2017

  74. [74]

    E. I. Rosenthal, B. J. Chapman, A. P. Higginbotham, J. Kerckhoff, and K. Lehnert, Breaking lorentz reci- procity with frequency conversion and delay, Physical Review Letters 119, 147703 (2017)

    work page 2017

  75. [75]

    Mahoney, J

    A. Mahoney, J. Colless, S. Pauka, J. Hornibrook, J. Watson, G. Gardner, M. Manfra, A. Doherty, and D. Reilly, On-chip microwave quantum hall circulator, Physical Review X 7, 011007 (2017)

    work page 2017

  76. [76]

    A. C. Mahoney, J. I. Colless, L. Peeters, S. J. Pauka, E. J. Fox, X. Kou, L. Pan, K. L. Wang, D. Goldhaber- Gordon, and D. J. Reilly, Zero-field edge plasmons in a magnetic topological insulator, Nature communications 8, 1836 (2017)

    work page 2017

  77. [77]

    Parra-Rodriguez, I

    A. Parra-Rodriguez, I. L. Egusquiza, D. P. DiVincenzo, and E. Solano, Canonical circuit quantization with lin- ear nonreciprocal devices, Phys. Rev. B 99, 014514 (2019)

    work page 2019

  78. [78]

    Leroux, A

    C. Leroux, A. Parra-Rodriguez, R. Shillito, A. D. Paolo, W. D. Oliver, C. M. Marcus, M. Kjaergaard, A. Gyenis, and A. Blais, Nonreciprocal devices based on voltage- tunable junctions (2022), arXiv:2209.06194 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  79. [79]

    Sellem, A

    L.-A. Sellem, A. Sarlette, Z. Leghtas, M. Mirrahimi, P. Rouchon, and P. Campagne-Ibarcq, A gkp qubit pro- tected by dissipation in a high-impedance supercon- ducting circuit driven by a microwave frequency comb (2023), arXiv:2304.01425 [quant-ph]. 31

    work page arXiv 2023

  80. [80]

    Flensberg, F

    K. Flensberg, F. von Oppen, and A. Stern, Engineered platforms for topological superconductivity and ma- jorana zero modes, Nature Reviews Materials 6, 944 (2021)

    work page 2021

Showing first 80 references.