Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

$f$-PO: Generalizing Preference Optimization with $f$-divergence Minimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.21662 v2 pith:RQ4AQ6KG submitted 2024-10-29 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords divergencesoptimizationpreferencelanguagemethodsalgorithmsalignmentdifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Preference optimization has made significant progress recently, with numerous methods developed to align language models with human preferences. This paper introduces $f$-divergence Preference Optimization ($f$-PO), a novel framework that generalizes and extends existing approaches. $f$-PO minimizes $f$-divergences between the optimized policy and the optimal policy, encompassing a broad family of alignment methods using various divergences. Our approach unifies previous algorithms like DPO and EXO, while offering new variants through different choices of $f$-divergences. We provide theoretical analysis of $f$-PO's properties and conduct extensive experiments on state-of-the-art language models using benchmark datasets. Results demonstrate $f$-PO's effectiveness across various tasks, achieving superior performance compared to existing methods on popular benchmarks such as AlpacaEval 2, Arena-Hard, MT-Bench, and Open LLM Leaderboard v2. Additionally, we present ablation studies exploring the impact of different $f$-divergences, offering insights into the trade-offs between regularization and performance in offline preference optimization. Our work contributes both practical algorithms and theoretical understanding to the field of language model alignment. Code is available at https://github.com/MinkaiXu/fPO.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Preference learning made easy: Everything should be understood through win rate

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Under two axioms (preference-consistency and prevalence-consistency), the only distribution-grounded evaluation for preference learning is h-win rate, and most popular alignment methods can be classified by whether th...

Pith tools