Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

HijackRAG: Hijacking Attacks against Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.22832 v1 pith:U4WGGRMJ submitted 2024-10-30 cs.CR cs.AIcs.IR

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.IR
keywords hijackragsystemsattackknowledgemodelsattackerattacksdifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems enhance large language models (LLMs) by integrating external knowledge, making them adaptable and cost-effective for various applications. However, the growing reliance on these systems also introduces potential security risks. In this work, we reveal a novel vulnerability, the retrieval prompt hijack attack (HijackRAG), which enables attackers to manipulate the retrieval mechanisms of RAG systems by injecting malicious texts into the knowledge database. When the RAG system encounters target questions, it generates the attacker's pre-determined answers instead of the correct ones, undermining the integrity and trustworthiness of the system. We formalize HijackRAG as an optimization problem and propose both black-box and white-box attack strategies tailored to different levels of the attacker's knowledge. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmark datasets show that HijackRAG consistently achieves high attack success rates, outperforming existing baseline attacks. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the attack is transferable across different retriever models, underscoring the widespread risk it poses to RAG systems. Lastly, our exploration of various defense mechanisms reveals that they are insufficient to counter HijackRAG, emphasizing the urgent need for more robust security measures to protect RAG systems in real-world deployments.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PURPOSE: Poisoning Conflict Resolution in RAG via Proxy-Fact-Grounded Updates

    cs.CR 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A black-box poisoning attack that frames false information as a fact-compatible update defeats conflict-resolution safeguards in RAG on most tested settings.

  2. Evaluating the Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation to Adversarial Evidence in the Health Domain

    cs.IR 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Misleading health documents in RAG context sharply lower LLM accuracy, and heavily helpful-biased retrieval pools restore it.

  3. Quantifying Conversation Drift in MCP via Latent Polytope

    cs.CL 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    SecMCP flags MCP conversation drift by thresholding per-layer activation distances from benign anchors, reporting AUROC above 0.915 on Llama3, Vicuna, and Mistral.

Pith tools