Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

RadFlag: A Black-Box Hallucination Detection Method for Medical Vision Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.00299 v2 pith:HZUTTGM2 submitted 2024-11-01 cs.CV cs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.LG
keywords methodradiologyblack-boxclaimshallucinationslanguagemodelmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Generating accurate radiology reports from medical images is a clinically important but challenging task. While current Vision Language Models (VLMs) show promise, they are prone to generating hallucinations, potentially compromising patient care. We introduce RadFlag, a black-box method to enhance the accuracy of radiology report generation. Our method uses a sampling-based flagging technique to find hallucinatory generations that should be removed. We first sample multiple reports at varying temperatures and then use a Large Language Model (LLM) to identify claims that are not consistently supported across samples, indicating that the model has low confidence in those claims. Using a calibrated threshold, we flag a fraction of these claims as likely hallucinations, which should undergo extra review or be automatically rejected. Our method achieves high precision when identifying both individual hallucinatory sentences and reports that contain hallucinations. As an easy-to-use, black-box system that only requires access to a model's temperature parameter, RadFlag is compatible with a wide range of radiology report generation models and has the potential to broadly improve the quality of automated radiology reporting.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Deterministic Hallucination Detection in Medical VQA via Confidence-Evidence Bayesian Gain

    cs.AI 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A fixed, sampling-free score — per-token log-probability variance times (1 + average |image-vs-text probability shift|) — detects medical-VQA hallucinations better than semantic-entropy baselines in 13 of 16 settings.

  2. Learning to See Locally and Align Clinically with Pathology Semantics for Radiology Report Generation

    eess.IV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Radiology report generation improves when image and text features are aligned through shared, CheXpert-initialized pathology prototypes and a masked-evidence objective; PALM reports state-of-the-art scores on three ch...

  3. TerraMAE: Learning Spatial-Spectral Representations from Hyperspectral Earth Observation Data via Adaptive Masked Autoencoders

    cs.CV 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    The abstract proposes TerraMAE, an adaptive channel-grouping masked autoencoder for hyperspectral Earth observation, but the manuscript body is a different paper, leaving the proposal without any supporting method or ...

  4. Trustworthy Medical Imaging with Large Language Models: A Study of Hallucinations Across Modalities

    eess.IV 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    AI models hallucinate when reading medical images and when generating them from text, producing false findings and anatomically impossible pictures.

Pith tools