Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Lingma SWE-GPT: An Open Development-Process-Centric Language Model for Automated Software Improvement

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.00622 v1 pith:HZS3UGSO submitted 2024-11-01 cs.SE cs.AI

classification cs.SEcs.AI
keywords softwarelingmaswe-gptimprovementmodelsprocessescodeissues
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advancements in LLM-based agents have led to significant progress in automatic software engineering, particularly in software maintenance and evolution. Despite these encouraging advances, current research faces two major challenges. First, SOTA performance primarily depends on closed-source models, which significantly limits the technology's accessibility, and potential for customization in diverse SE tasks. Second, these models are predominantly trained on static code data, lacking a deep understanding of the dynamic interactions, iterative problem-solving processes, and evolutionary characteristics inherent in software development. To address these challenges, our study adopts a software engineering perspective. We recognize that real-world software maintenance and evolution processes encompass not only static code data but also developers' thought processes, utilization of external tools, and the interaction between different functional personnel. Consequently, we introduce the Lingma SWE-GPT series, comprising Lingma SWE-GPT 7B and 72B. By learning from and simulating real-world code submission activities, Lingma SWE-GPT systematically incorporates the dynamic interactions and iterative problem-solving inherent in software development process, thereby achieving a more comprehensive understanding of software improvement processes. We conducted experimental evaluations using SWE-bench Verified benchmark. The results demonstrate that Lingma SWE-GPT 72B successfully resolves 30.20% of the GitHub issues, marking a significant improvement in automatic issue resolution (22.76% relative improvement compared to Llama 3.1 405B), approaching the performance of closed-source models (31.80\% issues of GPT-4o resolved). Notably, Lingma SWE-GPT 7B resolves 18.20% of the issues, highlighting the potential for applying smaller models to ASE tasks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MindForge: Teaching Small Language Models Whole-Life-Cycle Software Engineering via Source-Free Program Synthesis

    cs.SE 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Distilling 1,001 whole-life-cycle source-free program-synthesis trajectories into Qwen3.6-27B raises ProgramBench pass rate from 37.98% to 49.51% and transfers to seven unseen SE benchmarks.

  2. Evaluating LLM Agents on Automated Software Analysis Tasks

    cs.SE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    A purpose-built, staged LLM agent correctly sets up and executes software analysis tools on 33 of 35 benchmark tasks, outperforming general-purpose agent baselines by at least 17 percentage points.

  3. From Historical Patches to Repair Plans: Outcome-Conditioned Reasoning for Repository-Level Program Repair

    cs.SE 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Backward reasoning distilled from a repository's already-fixed issues, injected as prompts, lifts LLM repair success on SWE-Bench Lite by up to 10.4 Pass@1 points.

  4. SWE-Debate: Competitive Multi-Agent Debate for Software Issue Resolution

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A competitive multi-agent debate over graph-derived fault propagation chains lifts automated issue resolution on SWE-bench Verified to 41.4% pass@1.

  5. Position: Intelligent Coding Systems Should Write Programs with Justifications

    cs.SE 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A position paper advocating that intelligent coding systems should accompany code with justified explanations that are cognitively aligned and semantically faithful.

Pith tools