Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

MoE-I$^2$: Compressing Mixture of Experts Models through Inter-Expert Pruning and Intra-Expert Low-Rank Decomposition

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.01016 v1 pith:Q6RRYL5I submitted 2024-11-01 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords llmsdecompositionexpertspruningsizeefficiencyinter-expertintra-expert
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The emergence of Mixture of Experts (MoE) LLMs has significantly advanced the development of language models. Compared to traditional LLMs, MoE LLMs outperform traditional LLMs by achieving higher performance with considerably fewer activated parameters. Despite this efficiency, their enormous parameter size still leads to high deployment costs. In this paper, we introduce a two-stage compression method tailored for MoE to reduce the model size and decrease the computational cost. First, in the inter-expert pruning stage, we analyze the importance of each layer and propose the Layer-wise Genetic Search and Block-wise KT-Reception Field with the non-uniform pruning ratio to prune the individual expert. Second, in the intra-expert decomposition stage, we apply the low-rank decomposition to further compress the parameters within the remaining experts. Extensive experiments on Qwen1.5-MoE-A2.7B, DeepSeek-V2-Lite, and Mixtral-8$\times$7B demonstrate that our proposed methods can both reduce the model size and enhance inference efficiency while maintaining performance in various zero-shot tasks. The code will be available at \url{https://github.com/xiaochengsky/MoEI-2.git}

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PuzzleMoE: Efficient Compression of Large Mixture-of-Experts Models via Sparse Expert Merging and Bit-packed inference

    cs.LG 2025-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A training-free method that merges pairs of MoE experts at the individual-weight level and packs the required masks into unused exponent bits, cutting expert memory by 50% with minimal accuracy loss.

  2. Communication-Aware Placement and Pruning for Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Inference

    cs.DC 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Communication-aware expert placement plus device-level pruning yields 1.23–1.86× MoE inference throughput and better accuracy at equal speedup than load-balance or sequential baselines.

  3. ButterflyMoE: Compression-Scalable Ternary Experts via Structured Butterfly Orbits

    cs.LG 2026-01 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    Experts in an MoE are reparameterized as butterfly rotations of a single shared ternary matrix, giving O(d^2 + N d log d) memory and a claimed ~150x compression at 256 experts.

  4. Dropping Experts, Recombining Neurons: Retraining-Free Pruning for Sparse Mixture-of-Experts LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DERN prunes SMoE LLMs by decomposing removed experts into neuron segments, reassigning the best-matching ones to kept experts, and clustering them into compact replacements, beating prior pruning baselines without retraining.

  5. LExI: Layer-Adaptive Active Experts for Efficient MoE Model Inference

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LExI sets a different number of active experts per layer, found by weight-only sensitivity profiling and evolutionary search, improving MoE inference throughput with little accuracy loss.

  6. Sub-MoE: Efficient Mixture-of-Expert LLMs Compression via Subspace Expert Merging

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Sub-MoE compresses MoE LLMs by K-means clustering of experts plus frequency-weighted merging of right singular vectors after a shared SVD, and claims 96 and 86 percent retained accuracy at 25 and 50 percent expert red...

Pith tools