Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Adaptive Sparse Allocation with Mutual Choice & Feature Choice Sparse Autoencoders

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.02124 v2 pith:UJ3YJ2YK submitted 2024-11-04 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords saesfeatureschoicefeatureallocationlossproblemsparse
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are a promising approach to extracting features from neural networks, enabling model interpretability as well as causal interventions on model internals. SAEs generate sparse feature representations using a sparsifying activation function that implicitly defines a set of token-feature matches. We frame the token-feature matching as a resource allocation problem constrained by a total sparsity upper bound. For example, TopK SAEs solve this allocation problem with the additional constraint that each token matches with at most $k$ features. In TopK SAEs, the $k$ active features per token constraint is the same across tokens, despite some tokens being more difficult to reconstruct than others. To address this limitation, we propose two novel SAE variants, Feature Choice SAEs and Mutual Choice SAEs, which each allow for a variable number of active features per token. Feature Choice SAEs solve the sparsity allocation problem under the additional constraint that each feature matches with at most $m$ tokens. Mutual Choice SAEs solve the unrestricted allocation problem where the total sparsity budget can be allocated freely between tokens and features. Additionally, we introduce a new auxiliary loss function, $\mathtt{aux\_zipf\_loss}$, which generalises the $\mathtt{aux\_k\_loss}$ to mitigate dead and underutilised features. Our methods result in SAEs with fewer dead features and improved reconstruction loss at equivalent sparsity levels as a result of the inherent adaptive computation. More accurate and scalable feature extraction methods provide a path towards better understanding and more precise control of foundation models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Beyond the Hard Budget: Sparsity Regularizers for More Interpretable Top-k Sparse Autoencoders

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Sparsity regularizers applied before Top-k selection in SAEs improve monosemanticity and make reconstruction robust to inference-time k across vision models and datasets.

  2. Sparsification and Reconstruction from the Perspective of Representation Geometry

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Sparse encoding appears to stratify and compress feature representations, but the claimed causal link between cluster separation and reconstruction is not supported.

Pith tools