Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

The Fundamental Limit of Jet Tagging

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.02628 v2 pith:ZSGUUG6H submitted 2024-11-04 hep-ph hep-exphysics.data-an

classification hep-phhep-exphysics.data-an
keywords taggingdatasetmachineaddressbenchmarkcomplexfundamentalincreasingly
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Identifying the origin of high-energy hadronic jets ('jet tagging') has been a critical benchmark problem for machine learning in particle physics. Jets are ubiquitous at colliders and are complex objects that serve as prototypical examples of collections of particles to be categorized. Over the last decade, machine learning-based classifiers have replaced classical observables as the state of the art in jet tagging. Increasingly complex machine learning models are leading to increasingly more effective tagger performance. Our goal is to address the question of convergence -- are we getting close to the fundamental limit on jet tagging or is there still potential for computational, statistical, and physical insights for further improvements? We address this question using state-of-the-art generative models to create a realistic, synthetic dataset with a known jet tagging optimum. Various state-of-the-art taggers are deployed on this dataset, showing that there is a significant gap between their performance and the optimum. Our dataset and software are made public to provide a benchmark task for future developments in jet tagging and other areas of particle physics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Predict before you train: Scaling Laws for particle physics foundation models

    hep-ex 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A Chinchilla-style law fit on ParticleViT runs below 10^19 FLOPs predicts held-out pretraining loss within ~1% at >100× compute and tracks downstream jet-tagging rejection.

  2. A Step Toward Interpretability: Smearing the Likelihood

    hep-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Smearing the likelihood over an energy metric reveals the physical scales used by a jet classifier, and the needed smearing radius follows a power-law scaling with dataset size.

  3. The fundamental limit of jet tagging: Beyond top jets

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Using generative-model likelihood ratios, the authors estimate that modern taggers nearly reach the model-defined optimal limit for W, Z, and H-to-gg jets, while the top-jet gap remains large.

Pith tools