Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Adaptive exact recovery in sparse nonparametric models

Statistics Theory · Submitted 6 Nov 2024

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We derive the conditions when exact variable selection in the model at hand is possible and provide a selection procedure that achieves this type of selection.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2411.04320 (version 2)
Pith IDV53L2TNB, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationMarie Turcicova, Natalia Stepanova. "Adaptive exact recovery in sparse nonparametric models." arXiv:2411.04320 (2024). https://pith.science/paper/V53L2TNB
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,944 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.48 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.19 · compares with prior results 0.25 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We observe an unknown regression function of $d$ variables $f(\boldsymbol{t})$, $\boldsymbol{t} \in[0,1]^d$, in the Gaussian white noise model of intensity $\varepsilon>0$. We assume that the function $f$ is regular and that it is a sum of $k$-variate functions, where $k$ varies from $1$ to $s$ ($1\leq s\leq d$). These functions are unknown to us and only few of them are nonzero. In this article, we address the problem of identifying the nonzero components of $f$ in the case when $d=d_\varepsilon\to \infty$ as $\varepsilon\to 0$ and $s$ is either fixed or $s=s_\varepsilon\to \infty$, $s=o(d)$ as $\varepsilon\to \infty$. This may be viewed as a variable selection problem. We derive the conditions when exact variable selection in the model at hand is possible and provide a selection procedure that achieves this type of selection. The procedure is adaptive to a degree of model sparsity described by the sparsity parameter $\beta\in(0,1)$. We also derive conditions that make the exact variable selection impossible. Our results augment previous work in this area.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We observe an unknown regression function of $d$ variables $f(\boldsymbol{t})$, $\boldsymbol{t} \in[0,1]^d$, in the Gaussian white noise model of intensity $\varepsilon>0$. background 0.94 0.38 0.02 asserted 0.98
s1 We assume that the function $f$ is regular and that it is a sum of $k$-variate functions, where $k$ varies from $1$ to $s$ ($1\leq s\leq d$). background 0.79 0.20 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 These functions are unknown to us and only few of them are nonzero. background 0.99 0.10 0.02 asserted 1.00
s3 In this article, we address the problem of identifying the nonzero components of $f$ in the case when $d=d_\varepsilon\to \infty$ as $\varepsilon\to 0$ and $s$ is either fixed or $s=s_\varepsilon\to \infty$, $s=o(d)$ as $\varepsilon\to \infty$. contribution 0.53 0.22 0.07 asserted 0.81
s4 This may be viewed as a variable selection problem. interpretation 0.81 0.14 0.03 hedged possibility 0.94
s5 We derive the conditions when exact variable selection in the model at hand is possible and provide a selection procedure that achieves this type of selection. contribution 0.90 0.97 0.65 asserted 1.00
s6 The procedure is adaptive to a degree of model sparsity described by the sparsity parameter $\beta\in(0,1)$. contribution 0.48 0.86 0.11 asserted 1.00
s7 We also derive conditions that make the exact variable selection impossible. result 0.91 0.94 0.10 asserted 1.00
s8 Our results augment previous work in this area. contribution 0.69 0.35 0.04 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.94 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We observe an unknown regression function of $d$ variables $f(\boldsymbol{t})$, $\boldsymbol{t} \in[0,1]^d$, in the Gaussian white noise model of intensity $\varepsilon>0$. We assume that the function $f$ is regular and that it is a sum of $k$-variate functions, where $k$ varies from $1$ to $s$ ($1\leq s\leq d$). These functions are unknown to us and only few of them are nonzero. In this article, we address the problem of identifying the nonzero components of $f$ in the case when $d=d_\varepsilon\to \infty$ as $\varepsilon\to 0$ and $s$ is either fixed or $s=s_\varepsilon\to \infty$, $s=o(d)$ as $\varepsilon\to \infty$. This may be viewed as a variable selection problem. We derive the conditions when exact variable selection in the model at hand is possible and provide a selection procedure that achieves this type of selection. The procedure is adaptive to a degree of model sparsity described by the sparsity parameter $\beta\in(0,1)$. We also derive conditions that make the exact variable selection impossible. Our results augment previous work in this area.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.