Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Learning in Budgeted Auctions with Spacing Objectives

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.04843 v2 pith:U4KXTRGS submitted 2024-11-07 cs.GT cs.LG

classification cs.GTcs.LG
keywords regrettimelearningoptimalachieveconversionsevenonline
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In many repeated auction settings, participants care not only about how frequently they win but also how their winnings are distributed over time. This problem arises in various practical domains where avoiding congested demand is crucial, such as online retail sales and compute services, as well as in advertising campaigns that require sustained visibility over time. We introduce a simple model of this phenomenon, modeling it as a budgeted auction where the value of a win is a concave function of the time since the last win. This implies that for a given number of wins, even spacing over time is optimal. We also extend our model and results to the case when not all wins result in "conversions" (realization of actual gains), and the probability of conversion depends on a context. The goal is to maximize and evenly space conversions rather than just wins. We study the optimal policies for this setting in second-price auctions and offer learning algorithms for the bidders that achieve low regret against the optimal bidding policy in a Bayesian online setting. Our main result is a computationally efficient online learning algorithm that achieves $\tilde O(\sqrt T)$ regret. We achieve this by showing that an infinite-horizon Markov decision process (MDP) with the budget constraint in expectation is essentially equivalent to our problem, even when limiting that MDP to a very small number of states. The algorithm achieves low regret by learning a bidding policy that chooses bids as a function of the context and the system's state, which will be the time elapsed since the last win (or conversion). We show that state-independent strategies incur linear regret even without uncertainty of conversions. We complement this by showing that there are state-independent strategies that, while still having linear regret, achieve a $(1-\frac 1 e)$ approximation to the optimal reward.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Beyond the PPAD hardness of Auto-bidding Auctions

    cs.GT 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Under non-atomic value distributions, auto-bidding equilibria become separately monotone generalized Nash equilibria and PRIME solves them with last-iterate linear convergence.

  2. Learning in Strategic Queuing Systems with Small Buffers

    cs.GT 2025-02 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    With a one-packet buffer at each server, no-regret learning queues keep a strategic queueing system stable when total service capacity exceeds three times total arrival rate, and at least double capacity is necessary.

Pith tools