Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

FGGP: Fixed-Rate Gradient-First Gradual Pruning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.05500 v1 pith:PPKBVNQO submitted 2024-11-08 cs.CV cs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.LG
keywords networkpruningfixed-rategradient-firstgradualapproachconsidereddense
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In recent years, the increasing size of deep learning models and their growing demand for computational resources have drawn significant attention to the practice of pruning neural networks, while aiming to preserve their accuracy. In unstructured gradual pruning, which sparsifies a network by gradually removing individual network parameters until a targeted network sparsity is reached, recent works show that both gradient and weight magnitudes should be considered. In this work, we show that such mechanism, e.g., the order of prioritization and selection criteria, is essential. We introduce a gradient-first magnitude-next strategy for choosing the parameters to prune, and show that a fixed-rate subselection criterion between these steps works better, in contrast to the annealing approach in the literature. We validate this on CIFAR-10 dataset, with multiple randomized initializations on both VGG-19 and ResNet-50 network backbones, for pruning targets of 90, 95, and 98% sparsity and for both initially dense and 50% sparse networks. Our proposed fixed-rate gradient-first gradual pruning (FGGP) approach outperforms its state-of-the-art alternatives in most of the above experimental settings, even occasionally surpassing the upperbound of corresponding dense network results, and having the highest ranking across the considered experimental settings.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Efficient Column-Wise N:M Pruning on RISC-V CPU

    cs.DC 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Column-wise N:M pruning plus fused im2col and data packing accelerates ResNet inference on RISC-V vector CPUs by up to 4x while keeping ImageNet top-1 accuracy within 2.1% of the dense model.

Pith tools