Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Differential Privacy Under Class Imbalance: Methods and Empirical Insights

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.05733 v1 pith:3BVYGUEN submitted 2024-11-08 cs.LG cs.CR

classification cs.LGcs.CR
keywords datalearningimbalancemethodsprivateclassclass-weighteddifferential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Imbalanced learning occurs in classification settings where the distribution of class-labels is highly skewed in the training data, such as when predicting rare diseases or in fraud detection. This class imbalance presents a significant algorithmic challenge, which can be further exacerbated when privacy-preserving techniques such as differential privacy are applied to protect sensitive training data. Our work formalizes these challenges and provides a number of algorithmic solutions. We consider DP variants of pre-processing methods that privately augment the original dataset to reduce the class imbalance; these include oversampling, SMOTE, and private synthetic data generation. We also consider DP variants of in-processing techniques, which adjust the learning algorithm to account for the imbalance; these include model bagging, class-weighted empirical risk minimization and class-weighted deep learning. For each method, we either adapt an existing imbalanced learning technique to the private setting or demonstrate its incompatibility with differential privacy. Finally, we empirically evaluate these privacy-preserving imbalanced learning methods under various data and distributional settings. We find that private synthetic data methods perform well as a data pre-processing step, while class-weighted ERMs are an alternative in higher-dimensional settings where private synthetic data suffers from the curse of dimensionality.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Steps Adaptive Decay DPSGD: Enhancing Performance on Imbalanced Datasets with Differential Privacy with HAM10000

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    SAD-DPSGD, a step-adaptive decay schedule for noise and clipping in DP-SGD, reports about 1% higher accuracy than Auto-DPSGD on HAM10000 under differential privacy.

Pith tools